07.11.2016 Views

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

512 MONDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 2016<br />

No. 15–6373. Charles Christopher Lancaster, Petitioner v. Texas.<br />

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 15–6566. Kimberly T. Spence, Petitioner v. Carl J. Willis. Motion<br />

of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 15–6567. Kimberly T. Spence, Petitioner v. Carl J. Willis. Motion<br />

of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 15–6698. In Re Arturo Solis, Petitioner. Motion of petitioner for<br />

reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied.<br />

No. 15–6704. In Re Arturo Solis, Petitioner. Motion of petitioner for<br />

reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied.<br />

No. 15–6932. Christopher Stoller, Petitioner v. Consumer Financial<br />

Protection Bureau, et al. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of<br />

order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 15–6957. Cedric Greene, Jr., Petitioner v. California, et al. Motion<br />

of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied.<br />

No. 15–7133. Charles Kinney, Petitioner v. Michele Clark. Motion of<br />

petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner<br />

allowed until March 21, 2016, within which to pay the docketing fee<br />

required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with<br />

Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.<br />

No. 15–7149. Carolina G. Gonzales, Petitioner v. Industrial Claim<br />

Appeals Office of Colorado, et al. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed<br />

in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until March 21,<br />

2016, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a)<br />

and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of<br />

this Court.<br />

No. 15–7152. Phyllis Latka, Petitioner v. David Miles, et al. Motion<br />

of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner<br />

allowed until March 21, 2016, within which to pay the docketing fee<br />

required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with<br />

Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.<br />

No. 15–7182. Kimball Lundahl, Petitioner v. Holli Lundahl. Motion<br />

of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!