07.11.2016 Views

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

840 MONDAY, MAY 23, 2016<br />

No. 15–1036. Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Stevenson Leon Rose. Motion<br />

of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted.<br />

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,<br />

Western District denied.<br />

No. 15–1118. Michael’s Floor Covering, Inc., Petitioner v. Resilient<br />

Floor Covering Pension Fund, et al. Motion of Associated Builders and<br />

Contractors, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.<br />

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals<br />

for the Ninth Circuit denied.<br />

No. 15–8530. Patrick Alexandre Missud, Petitioner v. United States<br />

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to<br />

proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari<br />

dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this<br />

Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions<br />

in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee<br />

required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance<br />

with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,<br />

506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the<br />

consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.<br />

No. 15–8580. R. Wayne Johnson, Petitioner v. William Stephens, Director,<br />

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions<br />

Division. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule<br />

39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the<br />

Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal<br />

matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a)<br />

is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin<br />

v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per<br />

curiam).<br />

No. 15–8600. Crawley McFadden, Petitioner v. Detroit United Insurance,<br />

et al. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule<br />

39.8.<br />

No. 15–8651. Carole L. Scheib, Petitioner v. The Bank of New York<br />

Mellon. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis<br />

denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule<br />

39.8.<br />

No. 15–8912. Nawaz Ahmed, Petitioner v. Ed Sheldon, Warden. Motion<br />

of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and<br />

the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!