OT2015Journal

306 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2015
No. 15–6678. Juan Manuel Medrano-Hernandez, Petitioner v. United
States. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 15–6680. Mario Oliver Perez-Sanchez, aka Catfish, Petitioner v.
United States. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 15–6690. Leighton Fay, Petitioner v. Claude Maye, Warden. Petition
for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Tenth Circuit denied.
No. 15–6702. Phillip E. LaPointe, Petitioner v. Illinois. Petition for
writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District,
denied.
No. 15–6705. Dijon McClurkin, Petitioner v. Maryland. Petition for
writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
No. 15–115. Tyco Healthcare Group LP, et al., Petitioners v. Ethicon
Endo-Surgery, Inc. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied. Justice Alito took no
part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 15–161. Lloyd Rapelje, Warden, Petitioner v. Junior Fred Blackston.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Sixth Circuit denied. Justice Scalia, with whom Justice
Thomas and Justice Alito join dissenting from denial of the petition for
writ of certiorari.
No. 15–5628. Albert Holland, Jr., Petitioner v. Florida. Petition for
writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or
decision of this petition.
No. 15–6142. Thomas H. Clay, Petitioner v. William Stephens, Director,
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions
Division. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner
has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not
to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner
unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition
submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 15–6168. Jeffrey R. LeBlanc, Petitioner v. City of Kalamazoo,
Michigan. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis