OT2015Journal

552 MONDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 2016
No. 15–6330. Wayne Vinson, Petitioner v. Charles M. Maiorana,
Complex Warden. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no
part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 15–6679. Ruben Mitchell, Petitioner v. United States. Petition
for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration
or decision of this petition.
No. 15–7143. Fernando Fontanez, Petitioner v. Time Warner Cable,
et al. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit denied. The Chief Justice took no part in
the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 15–7307. Teddy Moore, Petitioner v. Grievance Committee for
the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts. Motion of petitioner
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for
writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly
abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept
any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the
docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in
compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court
of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 15–7364. Chauncey A. Williams, Petitioner v. A. D. James, et al.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied,
and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner
has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed
not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner
unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition
submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of
Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 15–7400. Jeffrey R. LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Bill Schuette. Motion
of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition
for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has
repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to
accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner
unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition
submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 15–7401. Jeffrey R. LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Patrick Duggan, et al.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied,
and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As peti­