07.11.2016 Views

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

910 MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2016<br />

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in<br />

light of Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U. S. –––<br />

(2016). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of<br />

this petition.<br />

No. 15–7553. Christopher Anthony Floyd, Petitioner v. Alabama. On<br />

petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama. Motion<br />

of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for<br />

writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to<br />

the Supreme Court of Alabama for further consideration in light of<br />

Foster v. Chatman, 578 U. S. ––– (2016).<br />

Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting from the<br />

decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: I would deny the<br />

petition for the reasons set out in my statement in Flowers v. Mississippi,<br />

579 U. S. ––– (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting from the decision to<br />

grant, vacate, and remand).<br />

Orders in Pending Cases<br />

No. 15M131. James R. Welcome, Petitioner v. Ray Mabus, Secretary<br />

of the Navy. Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran is denied.<br />

No. 15M132. Mark C. Jackson, Petitioner v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting<br />

Commissioner of Social Security. Motion to direct the Clerk to file<br />

a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.<br />

No. 15M133. Karen L. L’Ggrke, Petitioner v. Asset Plus Corporation,<br />

et al. Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of<br />

certiorari out of time denied.<br />

No. 15–1039. Sandoz Inc., Petitioner v. Amgen Inc., et al.; and<br />

No. 15–1195. Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sandoz Inc. The Solicitor<br />

General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views<br />

of the United States.<br />

No. 15–1189. Impression Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Lexmark<br />

International, Inc. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this<br />

case expressing the views of the United States.<br />

Certiorari Granted<br />

No. 15–1204. David Jennings, et al., Petitioners v. Alejandro Rodriguez,<br />

et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,<br />

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals<br />

for the Ninth Circuit granted.<br />

No. 15–1251. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. SW General,<br />

Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance. Petition for a writ of certiorari

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!