07.11.2016 Views

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

OT2015Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

808 MONDAY, MAY 16, 2016<br />

No. 15–8894. Gene Polk, Petitioner v. United States. Motion of petitioner<br />

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and the petition<br />

for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Kagan took no<br />

part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.<br />

No. 15–8896. Michael Ohayon, Petitioner v. United States. Petition<br />

for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the<br />

Ninth Circuit denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration<br />

or decision of this petition.<br />

Habeas Corpus Denied<br />

No. 15–8986. In Re Juan Sanchez, Petitioner. Petition for writ of<br />

habeas corpus denied.<br />

No. 15–9006. In Re Paul Benjamin Goist, Petitioner. Motion of petitioner<br />

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for<br />

a writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has<br />

repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to<br />

accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner<br />

unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition<br />

submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia<br />

Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).<br />

Mandamus Denied<br />

No. 15–8456. In Re Shaw Rahman, Petitioner;<br />

No. 15–8610. In Re Vivek Shah, Petitioner; and<br />

No. 15–8797. In Re Marcus Hahn, Petitioner. Petitions for writs of<br />

mandamus denied.<br />

No. 15–8441. In Re Cedric Greene, Petitioner. Motion of petitioner<br />

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ<br />

of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly<br />

abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any<br />

further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the<br />

docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in<br />

compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court<br />

of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).<br />

Rehearings Denied<br />

No. 14–9806. Robert Charles Cook, Petitioner v. Unknown<br />

Cashler, et al.;<br />

No. 15–788. Ellen Margelis, Petitioner v. IndyMac Bank, et al.;<br />

No. 15–794. Ralph D. Walker, Petitioner v. Elena Walker;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!