1968_4_arabisraelwar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UNITED STATES AND UNITED NATIONS / 171<br />
the war broke out. President de Gaulle insisted that any action required<br />
agreement among the Big Four, and when Russia rejected his suggestion for<br />
a summit conference, he kept France on the sidelines.<br />
At the same time, tentative plans were being considered in Washington,<br />
in consultation with London and other maritime powers, for creating an<br />
international flotilla, informally named Red Sea Regatta by its planners, to<br />
sweep away mines and provide a naval escort for vessels through the blockaded<br />
Strait to Eilat. Among the test cases considered by the Pentagon were<br />
a tanker, flying a neutral flag but carrying oil, which Egypt regarded as a<br />
strategic cargo, and an unarmed merchant ship, flying the Israeli flag, and<br />
exercising the right of innocent passage. Most military specialists thought<br />
that the U.S. seaplane tender and two destroyers in the Red Sea, together<br />
with some British vessels would be an adequate escort. Thought was also<br />
given to sending in the aircraft carrier Intrepid, which had just passed<br />
through the Suez Canal on its way to the Far East. The military assumption<br />
was that the Egyptians would not fire on this powerful armada, and, if they<br />
did, the flotilla would make the necessary "limited and controlled response,"<br />
i.e., putting the Egyptian shore batteries at Sharm el Sheikh out of commission.<br />
While a military challenge of the Egyptian blockade seemed a rather<br />
simple matter, there were grave fears in Washington and other capitals about<br />
the possible political consequences. An Egyptian clash with American or<br />
British forces might force the Russians to live up to their pledge to intervene.<br />
Defense Department officials testified that any serious or lengthy U.S.<br />
involvement in the Middle East would require the calling up of reserves.<br />
Washington was also concerned over the effect on its relations with the Arab<br />
states. Al Ahram stated that Egypt would regard any attempt to break the<br />
blockade as "aggression," and would retaliate by denying passage through<br />
the Suez Canal to the ships of any country that did so. State Department<br />
officials felt that pro-American Jordan and Saudi Arabia would be placed<br />
in an "impossible" position in the Arab world. Even the Washington Post,<br />
normally sympathetic to Israel, qualified its editorial calling for the U.S.<br />
to support Israel's free access to Eilat with the following caution:<br />
But nothing could serve our interests worse than a jingoist, unilateral effort<br />
to do so by waving the American flag. This would invite the cutting of pipelines<br />
and destruction or nationalization of U.S. and other Western oil interests.<br />
The governments of the other maritime nations had similar fears and<br />
hesitations. Premier Eshkol later said that Eban had been assured that some<br />
forty or fifty states would sign the maritime declaration. Yet only a handful<br />
in principle agreed to do so. At the beginning of June diplomatic efforts appeared<br />
deadlocked, and the Red Sea Regatta was becoming a far more exclusive<br />
yacht club than its sponsors intended. Besides Britain and the U.S.,<br />
only Australia and the Netherlands were willing to consider some kind of<br />
action to test the blockade.