24.12.2016 Views

1968_4_arabisraelwar

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, <strong>1968</strong><br />

ties cease forthwith.'" The next evening Syria and Israel officially accepted<br />

the cease-fire. On June 12 the Security Council unanimously passed<br />

a further resolution condemning "any and all violations of the cease-fire."<br />

(After the Egyptian sinking of the Israeli destroyer Eilat and the Israeli<br />

shelling of the Suez oil refineries, the Council on October 25 unanimously<br />

condemned "the violations of the cease-fire" and demanded that the states<br />

concerned "cease immediately all prohibited military activities in the area.")<br />

On June 14 the Council also unanimously adopted a resolution designed<br />

to spare the civilian population and prisoners of war additional suffering.<br />

It called on the government of Israel "to ensure the safety, welfare and<br />

security" of the inhabitants of the occupied areas and "to facilitate the return<br />

of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities."<br />

Addressing itself to all the governments concerned, the Council asked for<br />

the "scrupulous respect of the humanitarian principles governing the treatment<br />

of prisoners of war and the protection of civilian persons in time of<br />

war." (Implementing the resolution, Secretary General Thant, in July, appointed<br />

Nils-Goran Gussing, a Swedish diplomat working for the UN High<br />

Commissioner for Refugees, as his special representative. Gussing travelled<br />

throughout the area from mid-July to the beginning of September and submitted<br />

to the UN a detailed report on September 15. Though Thant interpreted<br />

Gussing's mandate under the resolution to include an investigation<br />

of the treatment of the Jewish minorities in Syria and the UAR, the Arab<br />

states resisted this interpretation [p. 133]).<br />

On the conditions for a peace settlement, the United States and the Soviet<br />

Union were poles apart in June. The United States opposed the Soviet call<br />

for an emergency session of the General Assembly on the formal ground that<br />

the Security Council was already seized of the issue and under the Charter<br />

had the primary responsibility for peace and security, and for the practical<br />

reason, stated by Goldberg, that the imperative need is "not for invective<br />

and inflammatory statements, but for constructive proposals and deliberative<br />

diplomacy." The Soviet Union won sufficient votes to call the Assembly into<br />

session.<br />

United States Peace Proposal<br />

An hour before Premier Kosygin's scheduled address at the UN General<br />

Assembly, on June 19, President Johnson stated the American position in a<br />

televised address from Washington. The United States, he said, was committed<br />

to a peace based on five principles: "The first and greatest principle<br />

is that every nation in the area has a fundamental right to live and to have<br />

this right respected by its neighbors." The second requirement was "justice<br />

for the refugees"; the third, the preservation of "the right of innocent maritime<br />

passage for all nations"; the fourth, "limits on the wasteful and<br />

destructive arms race." Johnson specifically requested that, as a first step, all<br />

UN members report to the UN their arms shipments to the Middle East. To

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!