1968_4_arabisraelwar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UNITED STATES AND UNITED NATIONS / 185<br />
who had crossed into Jordan. Lawrence Michelmore, commissioner-general<br />
of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in<br />
the Near East (UNRWA), stated that more than 100,000 of the persons<br />
who crossed into Jordan were refugees of the 1948 war or their children,<br />
and that about half of them were living in makeshift tent camps on the East<br />
Bank. He repeatedly urged that Israel allow those who wished to do so to<br />
return to the existing camps on the West Bank, where more or less permanent<br />
housing and adequate health and educational facilities existed, especially in<br />
the nearly deserted camps around Jericho.<br />
Israeli representatives replied that the exodus from the West Bank had<br />
been voluntary and based largely on economic, personal, and, in some cases,<br />
political preference. They said it was significant that one-third of the permit<br />
holders had apparently changed their minds and not chosen to return.<br />
Moreover, a steady stream of persons was continuing to leave the West<br />
Bank months after the end of the war—at the rate of 200 to 300 a day—<br />
and that even before the war, when both banks were under Jordanian control,<br />
there was a steady movement to the East Bank and to other neighboring<br />
countries, offering better economic opportunities.<br />
Israeli spokesmen also blamed Jordan for creating the conditions that led<br />
Jerusalem to restrict the number of refugees it was willing to allow to return<br />
in the absence of a peace settlement. While the return process was under way<br />
in August, various statements were issued by Jordanian cabinet ministers and<br />
over Amman radio, calling on the returnees to be "a thorn in the aggressor's<br />
flesh." In a letter to Thant, on August 16, Israel protested the Jordanian<br />
"campaign of increasing violence, vituperation and direct incitement, both of<br />
the prospective returnees and of the Arabs in Israel-controlled territories."<br />
On December 14 Ambassador Michael Comay, head of the Israel delegation,<br />
told the UN Assembly's Special Political Committee that Jordan's<br />
actions "converted a humanitarian question into a political and security one,<br />
and itself obstructed a general repatriation." Israel was unable to agree to<br />
an "open-door policy," he said, "unless and until there was a wider Israel-<br />
Jordan understanding,'^ and noted that the refugees themselves were "increasingly<br />
reluctant to come back until there was peace/' Comay called it<br />
"unrealistic to expect the government of Israel to permit an unrestricted and<br />
uncontrolled movement across the cease-fire lines, regardless of the policies,<br />
pronouncements or practices" of the Arab states whose citizens were involved.<br />
He concluded that the displacement of West Bank residents could best be<br />
adjusted "in the context of an honorable settlement with Israel."<br />
Later, at the same session, Congressman L. H. Fountain (Dem., N.C.),<br />
representative of the United States, repeated the United States view that all<br />
persons displaced during or since the June war "should be allowed and encouraged<br />
to return to their homes." After the Assembly's plenary on December<br />
19 unanimously reaffirmed the July resolution, asking Israel to facilitate<br />
the return of the new refugees, Fountain reiterated the United States