24.12.2016 Views

1968_4_arabisraelwar

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

178 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, <strong>1968</strong><br />

Premier Kosygin then introduced the Soviet resolution which charged<br />

Israel with "premeditated and previously prepared aggression against the<br />

United Arab Republic, Syria and Jordan." It asked the Security Council<br />

resolutely to condemn Israel's acts of aggression; demand that Israel "immediately<br />

and without any condition withdraw all its forces" to the pre-June 5<br />

armistice lines; demand that Israel pay in full and within the shortest possible<br />

time for "all the damage inflicted" on the neighboring Arab states and their<br />

nationals, and to return all seized property; in short, to undertake "immediate<br />

effective measures in order to eliminate all consequences" of the Israeli<br />

aggression.<br />

In the following weeks these themes were to be repeated countless times<br />

in the Assembly debates by Soviet bloc and Arab representatives. Almost<br />

buried under the avalanche of anti-Israel invective in Premier Kosygin's<br />

lengthy speech was one potentially significant point that set apart the Soviet<br />

position from that of the Arabs. In the midst of his tirade the Soviet Premier<br />

paused to note that "the Soviet Union is not against Israel—it is against the<br />

aggressive policy pursued by the ruling circles of that state." He then cited<br />

as one of the fundamental principles of Soviet policy the right of "every people<br />

. . to establish an independent national state of its own." It was this<br />

principle, he said, that moved the Soviet Union to support the 1947 UN<br />

plan to partition Palestine and to create two independent states, one Jewish<br />

and one Arab. "Guided by this fundamental policy," the Soviet Union recognized<br />

Israel and established diplomatic relations with it.<br />

It soon became clear that neither the American nor the Soviet resolution<br />

could command the two-thirds majority required for Assembly adoption. On<br />

July 4 the Assembly voted on the Soviet resolution, section by section, and<br />

rejected all parts.* The United States decided not to press its own resolution<br />

to a vote. The resolution submitted by Albania, Communist China's unofficial<br />

spokesman in the UN, was even more extreme than the Soviet in that it<br />

contained a condemnation of the United States and Britain for their "incitement,<br />

aid and direct participation" in the Israeli aggression, and a proviso,<br />

leaving to the UAR "alone to decide whether or not it can permit the passage<br />

of vessels of the Israel aggressors through the Suez Canal and the Strait of<br />

Tiran." The Albanian resolution was rejected by a vote of 71 to 22, with 27<br />

abstentions. It was supported by 10 Communist states (with Rumania and<br />

Yugoslavia abstaining) and 10 Arab states (with Libya, Morocco and Tunisia<br />

abstaining) as well as by Cambodia and Mauritania.<br />

Other Proposals<br />

Anticipating the defeat of its proposals, the Soviet Union threw its weight<br />

behind a draft resolution introduced by Yugoslavia and 16 "non-aligned"<br />

states. The Yugoslav resolution explicitly called on Israel to withdraw all its<br />

0 For tabulation of roll call votes, on July 4, on the Soviet and other resolutions see: US<br />

Monthly Chronicle (United Nations Office of Public Information), July 1967, pp. 78-79.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!