01.02.2017 Views

2jBVKVf

2jBVKVf

2jBVKVf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

asia policy<br />

In response, President Obama “explained that he hopes to convey to<br />

Prime Minister Abe and the people of Japan that the U.S.-Japan alliance<br />

is solid and the United States security commitment to Japan including its<br />

extended deterrence is unshakable.” 7<br />

Obtaining such explicit assurances from the United States is necessary<br />

not only for policy reasons but also for political reasons. With the<br />

increasing evidence that North Korea has been mastering technologies<br />

needed for the miniaturization of nuclear warheads and the development<br />

of submarine-launched ballistic missiles, it is reasonable to assess that<br />

Pyongyang is acquiring second-strike nuclear capabilities. Given that this<br />

could undermine the credibility of U.S. extended deterrence, it is imperative<br />

to demonstrate that the United States’ resolve to defend Japan from<br />

North Korea’s threats remains as strong as ever. Politically, these explicit<br />

assurances are important to calm a Japanese public that tends to be skeptical<br />

of the reliability of U.S. defense commitments. These factors explain why<br />

Japan swiftly expressed its opposition to the Obama administration’s idea<br />

of declaring “no first use” of nuclear weapons. 8 Japan also opposed the UN<br />

resolution on October 27 calling for the initiation of negotiations on a treaty<br />

banning nuclear weapons, despite sharp criticism from a domestic audience<br />

with strong anti-nuclear sentiments. That Japan did not merely abstain<br />

from voting reflects the Abe administration’s determination to maintain an<br />

effective U.S. nuclear umbrella. 9<br />

However, the surprising result of the 2016 U.S. presidential election<br />

rattled Japan’s confidence in U.S. extended deterrence. Within both the<br />

Japanese government and the Japanese public, the concern has risen that<br />

Donald Trump may act on the disturbing rhetoric of his presidential<br />

campaign—that South Korea and Japan should defend themselves by<br />

developing their own nuclear weapons if necessary, or that he would<br />

welcome a sit-down with Kim Jong-un. 10 The damage is already done; in a<br />

public opinion survey conducted after the election, 58% of those surveyed<br />

7 “Japan-U.S. Summit Telephone Talk,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Japan), September 9, 2016 u<br />

http://www.mofa.go.jp/na/na1/us/page4e_000519.html.<br />

8 Naoya Yoshino, “Bei no kaku sensei fushiyo kento, Nihon hukumu domeikoku hantai” [The United<br />

States Considers No-First-Use Policy of Nuclear Weapons, Allies Including Japan Disagree], Nikkei,<br />

August 17, 2016.<br />

9 “Kakukinshi kosho ketsugi: Nihon hantai ‘Anpo yusen’ ” [Conclusion of Nuclear Weapons Ban<br />

Negotiations: Japan Disagrees “U.S.-Japan Security Treaty Should Be Priority”], Mainichi Shimbun,<br />

October 28, 2016 u http://mainichi.jp/articles/20161029/k00/00m/030/156000c.<br />

10 Demetri Sevastopulo, “Donald Trump Open to Japan and South Korea Having<br />

Nuclear Weapons,” Financial Times, March 26, 2016 u https://www.ft.com/content/<br />

c927017c-f398-11e5-9afe-dd2472ea263d.<br />

[ 92 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!