09.02.2018 Views

news

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Publication Date<br />

Headline<br />

Outlet<br />

URL<br />

Snippet<br />

04-Feb-2018<br />

This SEC Rule Makes No Sense for Big Banks<br />

Bloomberg View<br />

Click to open<br />

The automatic bar from private placements is a wild non sequitur. This post originally<br />

appeared in Money Stuff.<br />

The Securities and Exchange Commission has some rules that provide that, if you do<br />

certain sorts of bad stuff, you can no longer do certain sorts of private placements of<br />

securities either for yourself or for your customers. There is an obvious intuitive appeal to<br />

these rules: Serial securities hucksters often make use of private placements to stay below<br />

the SEC's radar, and the SEC wants to keep known hucksters -- the rule calls them "bad<br />

actors" -- out of those markets.<br />

But the rules make no real sense for big banks. Sometimes a few employees in a big<br />

bank's, say, metals-trading division will do some bad stuff. For instance they might enter<br />

spoof orders to buy platinum that they don't really intend to buy. That is bad and they should<br />

stop and the bank should pay big fines and whatever. Maybe, if you are very tough, you<br />

might think that the bank should be banned from trading platinum for a while, or forever, or<br />

that it should be banned from trading metals generally. Maybe you are so tough that you<br />

think the bank's trading culture is irreparably broken and it should be banned from trading<br />

forever.<br />

But that never really happens, and the rules don't provide an easy way to make it happen.<br />

Instead, there is an automatic bar from private placements. But the people who do the<br />

private placements sit really far away from the people who do the platinum trading, and the<br />

metals trading, and the trading generally, and they never talk to each other. And it would<br />

obviously be silly to catch some metals traders spoofing, to fine their bank millions of<br />

dollars, and then to say "okay sure you can keep trading metals but you are banned from<br />

doing private placements of stock." That doesn't protect investors in private placements, it<br />

doesn't protect investors in metals market, it doesn't deter bad conduct by the metals<br />

traders, and it just generally has nothing to do with anything. And so in fact the SEC usually<br />

waives these automatic bars when big banks get caught doing bad things that have nothing<br />

to do with their private placements business. And then inevitably there is some gnashing of<br />

teeth and complaining that The Banksters Are Getting Away With Murder, and I write about<br />

it in sadness and perplexity. And here we go again:<br />

On Monday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reached settlements with<br />

Deutsche Bank, HSBC and UBS Group for a type of market manipulation called spoofing.<br />

The banks collectively paid just under $47 million to settle the civil charges without admitting<br />

or denying any wrongdoing.<br />

But while the commission and Justice Department trumpeted their crackdown on market<br />

manipulation, the settlements included language that gave all three banks an automatic<br />

waiver from the bad actor rule — drawing sharp criticism from one Securities and Exchange<br />

commissioner, a Democrat.<br />

“I am extremely disappointed by the C.F.T.C.’s actions in this case,” the commissioner, Kara<br />

Stein, said on Thursday. “They did not consult with the S.E.C. before injecting themselves<br />

into securities markets in which they have little or no expertise. The implications of the<br />

C.F.T.C.’s actions are deeply troubling and may put U.S. investors at risk.”<br />

Nope, that is wrong, spoofing by some Deutsche Bank metals traders won't put investors in<br />

Deutsche-Bank-run private placements at risk. More: If the automatic bar rules did not exist,<br />

there is absolutely no chance at all that Kara Stein would look at Monday's CFTC orders<br />

and say "you know the first thing we need to do is to ban these three banks from advising on<br />

private placements." Why would such a wild non sequitur occur to anyone?<br />

Well, because the automatic bar is there. So the burden is not to explain why metals<br />

spoofing should lead to a private-placement ban, but to explain why it shouldn't. That is easy<br />

enough to explain, but you can always find objectors. But of course our financial markets<br />

are now in a Trumpian deregulatory phase, in which there is no God and everything is<br />

permitted. Perhaps the SEC will just get rid of the automatic bars -- or make them opt-in<br />

rather than opt-out -- so that I can stop writing about them.If you'd like to get Money Stuff in<br />

handy email form, right in your inbox, please subscribe at this link. Thanks!<br />

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP<br />

and its owners.<br />

To contact the author of this story: Matt Levine at mlevine51@bloomberg.net<br />

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Greiff at jgreiff@bloomberg.net

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!