Natural Knowledge of God in the Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquina
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
.'<br />
not only tor it. beoom<strong>in</strong>g but equally as muCh tor it. oonservation <strong>in</strong><br />
be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
<strong>God</strong> wills <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, or <strong>the</strong> actuality ot <strong>the</strong> oreature's exi.tenoe;<br />
a. long a. it oont<strong>in</strong>ue. its existenoe, it does so because <strong>God</strong> wills<br />
to preserve it.30<br />
So utterly dependent on <strong>God</strong> i. <strong>the</strong> oreature that it <strong>God</strong>'s ooncurrenoe<br />
were to be withdrawn, <strong>the</strong> creature would be <strong>in</strong>capable ot action. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
ot <strong>God</strong> as First Mover applies as much tt <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
creatures as it does to <strong>the</strong> question ot motion <strong>in</strong> general. <strong>God</strong> is <strong>the</strong><br />
33<br />
Firat Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> every k<strong>in</strong>d ot motion, hence <strong>of</strong> every operation <strong>of</strong> created<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Created action without <strong>the</strong> concurrence ot Div<strong>in</strong>e action is<br />
as <strong>in</strong>oonceivable as love unsusta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> lover, or as <strong>the</strong> fragrance <strong>of</strong><br />
ot <strong>the</strong> lily cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong>dependently ot <strong>the</strong> lily's existence.31<br />
By predicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong> <strong>the</strong> pure perfections ot His creatures we have<br />
been able to say, <strong>in</strong>!. very <strong>in</strong>adequate way. what ~.!!.<br />
The knowledge<br />
30St• <strong>Thomas</strong>, Contra Gent., III, Pt. 1, chap. lxv, p. 155:<br />
The cause <strong>of</strong> a th<strong>in</strong>g:must needs be <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> cause ot its<br />
preservation; because preservation is noth<strong>in</strong>g elae than cont<strong>in</strong>ued existence<br />
•••• Now <strong>God</strong> is <strong>the</strong> cause ot everyth<strong>in</strong>g's existence by His <strong>in</strong>tellect<br />
and will. Therefore by His <strong>in</strong>tellect and will He preserves th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />
existence.<br />
I<br />
31St. <strong>Thomas</strong>, Contra Gent., III, Pt. 1, ohap. lxvii, p. 161:<br />
Now •• <strong>in</strong>ce <strong>God</strong> not only gave existence to th<strong>in</strong>gs when <strong>the</strong>y tirst<br />
began to exist. but also causes existence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m as long a. <strong>the</strong>y exi,t,<br />
by pre •• rv<strong>in</strong>g th.m <strong>in</strong> .xistenoe,•••• o. not only did Be give <strong>the</strong>m aotive<br />
torc.s when Be first made <strong>the</strong>m but is always oaus<strong>in</strong>g thoae toroes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Consequ.ntly, it <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>fluence wer. to o.a.e, all operation would<br />
oome to an end. Th.retore every operation ot a th<strong>in</strong>g is reducible to Bim<br />
as its cause.