37 of existence, (consequently, as manifold and divided).35 Obvioul1y, thi. is the only way in whioh finite beings can participate in the pure perfection of Infinite Being. That is why we have, in oreatures', multiplied representations of the unlimited perfeotion of an absolutely simple God • . .. .i, It also explains why man, who, in this present life, knows God only as created things manifest Him, multiplies the names by which He signifies God. Sinoe the pertections of creatures ar8~ifold, the concepts derived from these perfections are correspondingly multiplied. But God, of Whom these various ooncepts are formally predicated, possesses these and all possible perfections simply. absolutely perfect Being. 36 God is supremely one, He is simple and To say that pure perfections are only virtually predioated of God would be to imply the denial of the very thesis we are seeking to prove. St. Thomas explicitly states that names, such as good, or living, signify what can be essentially predioated of God. 37 It they merely signified 35St• Thomas, Summa Theologica, I a, q. 13, art. 5, cor.I ••• perfections pre-exist in God unitedly and simply, whereas in oreatures they are received, divided and multiplied. 36St. Thomas, Contra Gent., I, chap. xxxi, p. 75: ••• God by His one simple being possesses all manner ot perfections, which in a much lower degree others attain by various means. Whenoe it is clear how it is necessary to give several names to God. For, sinoe we cannot know Him naturally except by reaching Him trom His eftects, i~ follows that the ter.ms by which we denote His perfection must be diverse, as also are the pertections whioh we tind in things. 37 St. Thomas, Summa Theologioa, I a, q. 13, art. 2, cor.: ••• For in saying that God lives, they [ those who speak ot God] assuredly mean more than to say He is the oause of our life •••• Therefore we must hold ••• that these names signity the divine substance, and are predioated 8ubstantially of God •••• I
SS that God is the cause of goodness or of living, we could learn nothing of the essenoe of God from His created effects and God would in truth be unknowable. SS . ..., What creature. are by participation, that God is essentially. Because God is Being.!!!, He is infinite and eternal Goodneu; He is subsistent Goodness. Similarly, it may be said that God is subsistent Intelligence or Wisdom or Truth or simply, God is subsistelt Being. In a word, the various perfections predicated of God are in Him, not as really distinct, but as really identified although in *11 other beings perfections are really distinct. the plurality ot names signifies various aspects of the same Divine Reality according .!! these .!!!:!. apprehended .!?z 2! ~ their created ~ compod te likenesses. (Compost tion is not to be ascribed to that which is understood,--God, but to that which understands, viz., the human mind).S9 By means of a composite idea, (tor knowledge is according to the mode of the knower), the intellect understands God to be simple ,,.. SSSt. Thomas, Summa theologica, I a, q. IS, art. 2, cor.: Neither ••• are names applied to God and creatures in a purely equivocal sense, a8 some aave said. Because if that were so, it follows that trom creatures nothing could be known or demonstrated about God at all; for the reasoning would always be exposed to the fallacy of equivocation. I 39 St. Thomas, Contra Gent., I, chap. xxxvi, p. 81: For although our intellect arrive. at the knowledge of God by various conceptions, ••• it understands that what corresponds to them all is absolutely one: because our intellect does not ascribe its mode of understanding to the things which it understands, even as neither doe. it ascribe immateriality to a stone although it kno~ it immaterially.