10.04.2018 Views

Natural Knowledge of God in the Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquina

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62<br />

reason would lead <strong>the</strong>a; <strong>the</strong>y tail to reoopile oreated ettect. as~logue.<br />

ot <strong>the</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Be<strong>in</strong>g and thus <strong>the</strong>y taU to understand <strong>the</strong> manitold .... y. <strong>in</strong><br />

which <strong>God</strong> oaused sensible be<strong>in</strong>gs to represent <strong>the</strong> perfeotion ot Bie Inf<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

Be<strong>in</strong>g. 22 'ail<strong>in</strong>g to see be<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relation to Be<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>,. do not reo-<br />

..,<br />

ogni,e <strong>the</strong> oreature as a term ot that relation which b<strong>in</strong>ds t<strong>in</strong>ite to t<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

and all th<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> W<strong>in</strong>i te J<br />

with <strong>the</strong> bond <strong>of</strong> _taphyeical lUli ty. 1here<br />

results a distortion ot <strong>the</strong> per.pective <strong>of</strong> beJng; what ou~t to be a wuniver.e"<br />

beoomes an utterly diversified maltitude.<br />

!o those who deny <strong>the</strong> aaalogy ot be<strong>in</strong>g, nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> beoom<strong>in</strong>g nor <strong>the</strong><br />

be<strong>in</strong>g ot <strong>the</strong> t<strong>in</strong>i to turnishes man with a means ot aoquir<strong>in</strong>g natural knowledge<br />

ot <strong>God</strong>.<br />

'1'0 such, <strong>God</strong> reu<strong>in</strong>s lDlkDowable and <strong>the</strong> universe beco.e.<br />

oorrespond<strong>in</strong>gly un<strong>in</strong>telligible. !o <strong>the</strong> 1hom.t, <strong>the</strong> analogy <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g contera<br />

proportional unity on <strong>the</strong> diversitt <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>gs. !be <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sie relation<br />

ot be<strong>in</strong>g to existenoe that is oom.oa to all, tro. <strong>the</strong> least ot t<strong>in</strong>ite be·<br />

<strong>in</strong>g. to Inf<strong>in</strong>ite Be<strong>in</strong>g, enables <strong>the</strong> philosopher to beg<strong>in</strong> his <strong>in</strong>quiry con­ .....<br />

• el"lliDg <strong>God</strong> '. existenoe and Bi. nature with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>8ufticiency ot <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

and to reach positive conclusions about <strong>God</strong>'. existeaoe and Bis attributes.<br />

I<br />

22 St. tha.a., Summa 1heOl0eica, I a, q. 12, art. 12, cor ••<br />

Our alad can not be led .ense .0 tar aa to .ee <strong>the</strong> e •• enoe <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong>,<br />

ftoau.e <strong>the</strong> senaible ettects ot <strong>God</strong> do not equal <strong>the</strong> po .... r ot <strong>God</strong> a. <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

oau.e. Benoe tro. <strong>the</strong> knowledge ot .ensible th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>the</strong> whole po .... r ot <strong>God</strong><br />

cumot be DOWIl... But beoaJl.e <strong>the</strong>y are Bi. etfeota and depend on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

oau.e, ... oan be led trom <strong>the</strong>m .0 tar a. to know ot <strong>God</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r Be ezbt.,<br />

and to know <strong>of</strong> Bia what must nece •• arill" belong to Hi., as <strong>the</strong> tIrst cau.e<br />

ot all th<strong>in</strong>gs, exceed<strong>in</strong>g all th<strong>in</strong>gs oau.ed by Bia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!