Natural Knowledge of God in the Philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquina
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
49<br />
relation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oreature to its ezistenoe. 6 Still, <strong>the</strong>re is betweeh <strong>the</strong>se<br />
relations a at.ilaritT, or, to speak more technioally, a proportionality.<br />
Upon this proportionality are based our analogioal predioation. <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perf.otions<br />
ot <strong>God</strong> as .anitestedbJ His ettects •<br />
.<br />
We have said, <strong>God</strong> is <strong>in</strong>telligent, all iD~ledge is Hia.<br />
!be oonoept<br />
ie analogioal. We have experience <strong>of</strong> huan knowledge, whioh denoted apprehension<br />
ot <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligible or, union <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ,<strong>in</strong>g knOWl'l and <strong>the</strong> knower.<br />
Human knowledge is dependent on sensible data, it must ditfer elsentially<br />
trom <strong>the</strong> knowledse predioated ot an ab.olutely .imple and t.mutable Be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
What i. BtOre, .... use <strong>the</strong> word knowledge analogically whenever we u.e it to<br />
reter to sen.ation, it too 11 a union ot <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>g known with <strong>the</strong> knower,<br />
but bJ ... n. ot a .ensible speoies. !be difterence between sensation and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tellection is an e •• ential ditterenoel one require. a material, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
an immaterial tacul ty • Still, both are oorreotly named knowledge, tor both<br />
reter to union between a oogni tive taoul tJ and it. proper objeot, <strong>the</strong> re-.<br />
• ul t ot whioh ie knowledge.<br />
'!hie union or knowledge exists aleo <strong>in</strong> <strong>God</strong>, but<br />
<strong>in</strong> a way that ditter. trom huan knowledge, by a. much a. <strong>God</strong> ditters fro.<br />
6 st. !bemas, Contra Gent., I, ohap. xxxii, p. TT: I<br />
Bow noth<strong>in</strong>g is predioated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> .ame order ot <strong>God</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
but, acoord<strong>in</strong>g to priority and poeterioritJl s<strong>in</strong>oe all predioates <strong>of</strong> <strong>God</strong><br />
are e.sential tor He is oalled be<strong>in</strong>g beoau.e He il very e •• enoe, and good<br />
because He is goodness itaelt. whereas predicate. are applied to o<strong>the</strong>rs by<br />
part1oipation ••• !heretore it is impossible tor any th<strong>in</strong>g to be predioated<br />
uni"oca1l7 ot <strong>God</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs.