ifda dossier 74 - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
ifda dossier 74 - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
ifda dossier 74 - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
non-alignment, which can be added to the list of shared features.6 Non-<br />
alignment, in the sense of formal non-adherence to either the Western<br />
or the Communist bloc by way of a military pact, is no more than an<br />
expression of independence, so newly acquired.7<br />
Given the fact that there existed a basis for collaboration, it could be<br />
expected that there has in fact been informal cooperation between the<br />
new states in the UN from the very start.7 This grouping acquired a<br />
more formal status after the new Delhi Conference of 1949. Nehru<br />
convened this meeting of newly independent countries of Asia and two<br />
African countries, Egypt and Ethiopia, making this the first Afro-Asian<br />
gathering before the later and more well-known Bandung Afro-Asian<br />
Conference of 1955. This second New Delhi Conference was to discuss<br />
recent events in Indonesia where the colonial power, the Dutch, had just<br />
incarcerated Indonesian nationalists. As the Dutch ignored a Security<br />
Council ruling requiring the release of the nationalist leaders, it was felt<br />
that the "the free countries of Asia" (Nehru's phrase 8) should seek<br />
solutions to the Indonesian problem. The call for more permanent<br />
arrangements for consultation arose at this conference so that, subse-<br />
quently, the Afro-Asian states increased their efforts at consultation and<br />
cooperation at the UN. By the end of 1950, the Afro-Asian Bloc had<br />
become a reality.<br />
While the Afro-Asian Bloc was able to act in concert on issues of<br />
shared interest, the specific needs and preferences of member countries<br />
diverged, with their foreign policies reflecting their particular Cold War<br />
affiliations, especially in the atmosphere of intense rivalry of the 1950s.<br />
The Bandung Conference of 1955 has often been touted as the high<br />
point of Afro-Asian collaboration, despite the variety of positions which<br />
surfaced in the course of the conference.5 It is the unity attained in the<br />
final communique which gave rise to the myth of Bandung, i.e. an Afro-<br />
Asian solidarity which is more apparent that real. As it was difficult to<br />
expect to achieve unity from such a heterogenous gathering, the<br />
tendency for smaller groupings to emerge resulted in a separate African<br />
caucus in the UN in 1958 8 and regional organizations in the 1960s<br />
such as the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and Association of<br />
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In fact, after Bandung, efforts to<br />
convene a second Bandung came to nought. It should, however, be