The Geometry of Ships
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 THE PRINCIPLES OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE SERIES<br />
vessel will operate at varying loadings, so the plane <strong>of</strong><br />
flotation is at least somewhat variable, and LWL is<br />
hardly a geometric constant. Further, if an appendage<br />
(commonly a rudder) intersects the waterplane, it is<br />
sometimes unclear whether it can fairly be included in<br />
LWL; the consensus would seem to be to exclude such<br />
an appendage, and base LWL on the “canoe hull,” but<br />
that may be a difficult judgment if the appendage is<br />
faired into the hull. Nevertheless, LWL is almost universally<br />
represented amongst the particulars.<br />
Design Waterline (DWL): a vessel such as a yacht which<br />
has minimal variations in loading will have a planned<br />
flotation condition, usually “half-load,” i.e., the mean<br />
between empty and full tanks, stores, and provisions.<br />
DWL alternatively sometimes represents a maximumload<br />
condition.<br />
Length Between Perpendiculars (LBP or LPP): a common<br />
length measure for cargo and military ships,<br />
which may have relatively large variations in loading.<br />
This is length between two fixed longitudinal locations<br />
designated as the forward perpendicular (FP)<br />
and the aft perpendicular (AP). FP is conventionally<br />
the forward face <strong>of</strong> the stem on the vessel’s summer<br />
load line, the deepest waterline to which she can<br />
legally be loaded. For cargo ships, AP is customarily<br />
the centerline <strong>of</strong> the rudder stock. For military ships,<br />
AP is customarily taken at the aft end <strong>of</strong> DWL, so<br />
there is no distinction between LBP and DWL.<br />
Beam: the maximum lateral extent <strong>of</strong> the molded hull<br />
(excluding trim, guards, and strakes).<br />
Draft: the maximum vertical extent <strong>of</strong> any part <strong>of</strong> the vessel<br />
below waterline; therefore, the minimum depth <strong>of</strong><br />
water in which the vessel can float. Draft, <strong>of</strong> course, is<br />
variable with loading, so the loading condition should<br />
be specified in conjunction with draft; if not, the DWL<br />
loading would be assumed.<br />
Displacement: the entire mass <strong>of</strong> the vessel and contents<br />
in some specified loading condition, presumably that<br />
corresponding to the DWL and draft particulars.<br />
Tonnage: measures <strong>of</strong> cargo capacity. See Section 13 for<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> tonnage measures.<br />
Form coefficients, such as block and prismatic coefficient,<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten included in particulars. See Section<br />
10 for definition and discussion <strong>of</strong> common form<br />
coefficients.<br />
Obviously, the particulars furnish no detail about the<br />
actual shape <strong>of</strong> the vessel. However, they serve (much<br />
better, in fact, than a more detailed description <strong>of</strong> shape)<br />
to convey the gross characteristics <strong>of</strong> the vessel in a very<br />
compact and understandable form.<br />
1.2.2 Offsets. Offsets represent a ship hull by<br />
means <strong>of</strong> a tabulation or sampling <strong>of</strong> points from the hull<br />
surface (their coordinates with respect to certain reference<br />
planes). Being a purely numerical form <strong>of</strong> shape<br />
representation, <strong>of</strong>fsets are readily stored on paper or in<br />
computer files, and they are a relatively transparent<br />
form, i.e., they are easily interpreted by anyone familiar<br />
with the basics <strong>of</strong> cartesian analytic geometry. <strong>The</strong> completeness<br />
with which the hull is represented depends, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, on how many points are sampled. A few hundred<br />
to a thousand points would be typical, and would generally<br />
be adequate for making hydrostatic calculations<br />
within accuracy levels on the order <strong>of</strong> 1 percent. On the<br />
other hand, <strong>of</strong>fsets do not normally contain enough information<br />
to build the boat, because they provide only 2-<br />
D descriptions <strong>of</strong> particular transverse and longitudinal<br />
sections, and there are some aspects <strong>of</strong> most hulls that<br />
are difficult or impossible to describe in that form<br />
(mainly information about how the hull ends at bow<br />
and stern).<br />
An <strong>of</strong>fsets-level description <strong>of</strong> a hull can take two<br />
forms: (1) the <strong>of</strong>fset table, a document or drawing presenting<br />
the numerical values, and (2) the <strong>of</strong>fset file, a<br />
computer-readable form.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset table and its role in the traditional fairing<br />
and l<strong>of</strong>ting process are described later in Section 8. It is<br />
a tabulation <strong>of</strong> coordinates <strong>of</strong> points, usually on a regular<br />
grid <strong>of</strong> station, waterline, and buttock planes. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset<br />
table has little relevance to most current construction<br />
methods and is <strong>of</strong>ten now omitted from the process<br />
<strong>of</strong> design.<br />
An <strong>of</strong>fset file represents the hull by points which are<br />
located on transverse sections, but generally not on any<br />
particular waterline or buttock planes. In sequence, the<br />
points representing each station comprise a 2-D polyline<br />
which is taken to be, for purposes <strong>of</strong> hydrostatic calculations,<br />
an adequate approximation <strong>of</strong> the actual curved<br />
section. Various hydrostatics program packages require<br />
different formats for the <strong>of</strong>fset data, but the essential file<br />
contents tend to be very similar in each case.<br />
1.2.3 Wireframe. Wireframes represent a ship hull<br />
or other geometry by means <strong>of</strong> 2-D and 3-D polylines or<br />
curves. For example, the lines drawing is a 2-D wireframe<br />
showing curves along the surface boundaries,<br />
and curves <strong>of</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> the hull surface with specified<br />
planes. <strong>The</strong> lines drawing can also be thought <strong>of</strong> as<br />
a 3-D representation (three orthogonal projections <strong>of</strong> a<br />
3-D wireframe). Such a wireframe can contain all the information<br />
<strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fsets table or file (as points in the<br />
wireframe), but since it is not limited to transverse sections,<br />
it can conveniently represent much more; for example,<br />
the important curves that bound the hull surface<br />
at bow and stern.<br />
Of course, a wireframe is far from a complete surface<br />
definition. It shows only a finite number (usually a very<br />
small number) <strong>of</strong> the possible plane sections, and only a<br />
sampling <strong>of</strong> points from those and the boundary curves.<br />
To locate points on the surface that do not lie on any<br />
wires requires further interpolation steps, which are<br />
hard to define in such a way that they yield an unequivocal<br />
answer for the surface location. Also, there are many<br />
possibilities for the three independent 2-D views to be<br />
inconsistent with each other, yielding conflicting or ambiguous<br />
information even about the points they do presume<br />
to locate. Despite these limitations, lines drawings