15.04.2019 Views

The Geometry of Ships

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 THE PRINCIPLES OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE SERIES<br />

If either or both <strong>of</strong> the curves is reparameterized, a<br />

different ruled surface will be produced by this construction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> straight lines (u constant isoparms) are<br />

called the generators or rulings <strong>of</strong> the surface. A ruled<br />

surface has zero or negative Gaussian curvature.<br />

A developable surface is one that can be rolled out flat<br />

by bending alone, without stretching <strong>of</strong> any element.<br />

Conversely, it is a surface that can be formed from flat<br />

sheet material by bending alone, without in-plane strain<br />

(Fig. 18).<br />

<strong>The</strong> opposite <strong>of</strong> “developable” is “compound-curved.”<br />

Geometrically, a developable surface is characterized by<br />

zero Gaussian curvature. Developable surfaces are pr<strong>of</strong>oundly<br />

advantageous in ship design because <strong>of</strong> their<br />

relative ease <strong>of</strong> manufacture, compared with compoundcurved<br />

surfaces. A key strategy for “produceability” is to<br />

make as many <strong>of</strong> the surfaces <strong>of</strong> a vessel as possible<br />

from developable surfaces; this can be 100 percent.<br />

Cylinders and cones are well-known examples <strong>of</strong> developable<br />

surfaces. A general cylinder is a surface swept<br />

by movement <strong>of</strong> a straight line that remains parallel to a<br />

given line. A general cone is a surface swept by movement<br />

<strong>of</strong> a straight line that always passes through a given<br />

Fig. 18<br />

Fig. 17<br />

A chine hull constructed from two ruled surfaces.<br />

A chine hull made from developable surfaces spanning three<br />

longitudinal curves.<br />

point (the apex). One design method for developable<br />

surfaces, “multiconic development,” pieces together<br />

patches from a series <strong>of</strong> cones, constructed to have G 1<br />

continuity with one another, to produce a developable<br />

composite surface.<br />

All developable surfaces are ruled. However — and<br />

this is a geometric fact that is widely misapprehended in<br />

manufacturing and design — not all ruled surfaces are<br />

developable. In fact, developable surfaces are a very narrow<br />

and specialized subset <strong>of</strong> ruled surfaces. One way to<br />

distinguish developable surfaces is that they are the<br />

ruled surfaces with zero Gaussian curvature. Alternatively,<br />

a developable surface is a special ruled surface<br />

with the property that it has the same tangent plane at all<br />

points <strong>of</strong> each generator.<br />

This latter property <strong>of</strong> developable surfaces is the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> Kilgore’s method, a valid drafting procedure for<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> developable hulls and other developable<br />

surfaces (Kilgore 1967). Nolan (1971) showed how to implement<br />

Kilgore’s method in a computer program for the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> developable hull forms.<br />

4.12 Transfinite Surfaces. <strong>The</strong> B-spline and NURBS<br />

surfaces, supported as they are by arrays <strong>of</strong> points, each<br />

have a finite supply <strong>of</strong> data and, therefore, a finite space<br />

<strong>of</strong> possible configurations. Generally, this is not limiting<br />

when designing a single surface in isolation, but many<br />

problems arise when surfaces have to join each other in<br />

a complex assembly. In order for two NURBS surfaces<br />

to join (G 0 continuity) with mathematical precision, they<br />

must have (in general):<br />

• the same set <strong>of</strong> control points along the common edge;<br />

• the same polynomial degree in this direction;<br />

• the same knotlist in this direction; and<br />

• proportional weights on the corresponding control<br />

points.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are stringent requirements rarely met in<br />

practice.<br />

Further, if a surface needs to meet an arbitrary (non-<br />

NURBS) curve (for example, a parametric curve embedded<br />

in another surface), it will have only a finite number<br />

<strong>of</strong> control points along that edge, and therefore can only<br />

approximate the true curve to a finite precision. In<br />

NURBS-based modeling, therefore, nearly all junctions<br />

are approximate, or defined by intersections. This<br />

causes a large variety <strong>of</strong> problems in manufacturing and<br />

in transfer <strong>of</strong> surface and solid models between systems<br />

which have different tolerances.<br />

Transfinite surfaces are generated from curves rather<br />

than points and, consequently, are not subject to the<br />

same limitations. Examples <strong>of</strong> transfinite surfaces already<br />

mentioned above are:<br />

• Ruled surface: it interpolates its two edge curves<br />

exactly<br />

• L<strong>of</strong>ted surfaces: they interpolate their two end master<br />

curves<br />

• Developable surface: constructed between two curves<br />

by Kilgore’s method.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!