19.12.2012 Views

free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network

free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network

free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cultural identities <strong>in</strong> Southeastern Europe - a post-transitional perspective<br />

that has already allowed for the changes <strong>in</strong> the experiences of both space and time, for<br />

their compression and for new <strong>in</strong>terpretations of such experiences. Perhaps this is what<br />

we are talk<strong>in</strong>g about when we discuss cultural identities <strong>in</strong> Southeastern Europe today.<br />

Cultural spaces <strong>in</strong> Southeastern Europe have been usually structured as national (or<br />

ethnic) (national language, cultural values, memories, etc.) and territorially defi ned<br />

(conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a majority national culture and <strong>in</strong> most cases a number of m<strong>in</strong>ority ethnic<br />

cultures). Such a structure of cultural space has been rather typical of all countries <strong>in</strong><br />

Southeastern Europe, and as all of them except Greece entered the systemic transition<br />

from socialism to capitalism, this structural characteristic became the start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for<br />

the changes that occurred. Th e same structure provided the context for cultural policies<br />

that have been thought of as national and strongly culture specifi c.<br />

With the <strong>in</strong>fl uences of globalization the (imag<strong>in</strong>ed) borders between Southeast<br />

European cultures and their cultural spaces have become blurred, particularly with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

former Yugoslavia where <strong>in</strong>tercultural contacts were encouraged and sometimes even<br />

enforced (for example through language policies, mediatization of cultures, common<br />

projects, etc.). Th e systemic transition, clearly marked by the dissolution of Yugoslavia,<br />

oriented all cultures to memories and prompted cultural ethnicization. At the same<br />

time, the <strong>in</strong>ternal cultural diff erentiations with<strong>in</strong> the national cultures and national<br />

states have been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. Th e relationships between majority and m<strong>in</strong>ority cultures<br />

have been gradually re<strong>in</strong>terpreted (not to say problematized) so as to <strong>in</strong>cite confl icts<br />

or, on the contrary, to support acceptance of others and enhance tolerance of cultural<br />

diversity and multiculturalism.<br />

Cultures have never correlated completely with the sovereign states, but cultural spaces<br />

have been divided follow<strong>in</strong>g the visible diff erences among cultures: languages, customs and<br />

traditions, geographical sett<strong>in</strong>gs, ethnic roots, and so forth. However, as the globalized,<br />

deterritorialized and a-territorial contents gradually enter all cultures and cultural spaces,<br />

the exist<strong>in</strong>g cultural spaces imbued by cultural communication and mediatization of<br />

cultures open up to some common values, common cultural behaviour and common<br />

traditions. In a way, the concept of cultural space has been gradually substituted by the<br />

concept of (deterritorialized) culture itself. 1 However, as we still speak diff erent languages<br />

(even at the age of technologically defi ned communication), and live <strong>in</strong> diff erent cultural<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>gs defi ned by diff erent cultural values, the need to defi ne and redefi ne cultural<br />

identities has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly accepted as a justifi ed request.<br />

In this respect, some structural elements of the particular (national) cultural space<br />

have been re<strong>in</strong>vented and are surviv<strong>in</strong>g. Th ese are not evident <strong>in</strong> the established<br />

1 Terry Eagleton (2005: 31) th<strong>in</strong>ks that the development of cultural theory might be a response<br />

to the realities of the 1960s. Th e name of theory has been given to “the critical self-refl ection”,<br />

which has widened the concept of culture: comfort, passion, arts, language, media, body,<br />

gender, ethnicity – all this is expressed <strong>in</strong> one word – the culture (2005: 40).<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!