free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies
centred on the current Austrian perception of the identities of inhabitants of the Balkans.
Th e second presenter in the panel was Jaka Primorac from the Institute for International
Relations with a paper entitled “Culture of hits vs. culture of niches – cultural industries
and processes of cultural identifi cation in Croatia” where she highlighted the emergence
of two cultures that are infl uencing the development of new identitarian models that
are becoming more dominant in Croatia. By giving an analysis of the selected data on
cultural consumption and cultural production she outlined how, on the one hand, there
is a strong infl uence from global cultural industry in Croatia (that is also present in the
region) but, on the other hand, there are opportunities that are off ered by the culture
of niches. Th e following presenter was Maja Breznik from the Peace Institute with a
paper entitled “Cultural identities from the bottom up – labour relations perspective”
where she approached the re-questioning of cultural identities from the perspective of
labour relations taking ‘artists’ and ‘authors’, that is, the ‘creative class’ as the subject of
her examination. Th e main focus of the presentation dealt with the identity of cultural
workers due to their present precarious labour relations and the ever-present reduction
of their labour rights. In the next presentation entitled “From productivity to creativity
– the role of art collectives in solving the contradictions of the transitional period”, guest
speaker Sezgin Boynik from the University of Jyväskylä, Finland, brought collective
and collaborational art practices to the attention of the panel. He analysed how the
ideological implications of collective art practices in the post-Yugoslav states relate
to the conception of socialist self-management and the transition from socialism to
capitalism. In his analysis he gave examples of several collective art practices, mainly
from Croatia. Aft er the presentations a short discussion followed where the audience
asked for clarifi cation of selected historical data relating to certain issues of Austrian
infl uence in the region, and of defi nitions of the Southeast European/Balkan region.
Th e need for more refi ned explanation of the infl uence of global cultural industry on the
culture in the region of Southeastern Europe was also stressed, which was related to the
second presentation in the panel.
Th e second panel of the conference was devoted to “Visual and performative reconstruction
of identities” and was chaired by Andrea Komlosy. Th e fi rst presentation was
delivered by Milena Dragićević Šešić from the University of Arts in Belgrade, on the topic
of the “Cultural policies, identities and monument building in Southeastern Europe”.
Dragićević-Šešić dealt with the politics of memory, with its structures of remembering,
repressing and forgetting as forms of ‘predatory nationalism’ (Appadurai), through
the public cultural and educational system. By analysing a number of performances,
installations and exhibitions she outlined a hypothesis that the public arts in Belgrade
throughout the 1990s had an ambiguous and ambivalent role that depended on the
organizers’ and/or producers’ intentions. In the presentation she focused on those aspects
of public arts that questioned the offi cial policy of remembrance and representation, and
turned instead to a new offi cial urban policy suggesting a concept for public space as space
for entertainment and consumption. Th e next presenter was Aldo Milohnić from the
168