free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network
free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network
free download in pdf format - Culturelink Network
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cultural Identity Politics <strong>in</strong> the (Post-)Transitional Societies<br />
86<br />
“Imag<strong>in</strong>e if the Internet took hold <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Imag<strong>in</strong>e how fr eedom would spread.”<br />
George W. Bush, Phoenix, Arizona, December 1999.<br />
While it might seem odd to start a text on redefi n<strong>in</strong>g cultural identities with a quote<br />
from a former US president, it nevertheless serves a purpose of highlight<strong>in</strong>g one of the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> misconceptions <strong>in</strong> discussions surround<strong>in</strong>g digital media and the Internet. It is oft en<br />
stated that the Internet has a signifi cant impact on cultural identities. Th is is certa<strong>in</strong>ly true<br />
to some extent but should not be left <strong>in</strong> this unidirectional form. Th is technological impact<br />
thesis, apart from simplify<strong>in</strong>g the Internet, shows a fundamental disregard for social and<br />
cultural diff erences and the ways that the technology is be<strong>in</strong>g used or <strong>in</strong>terpreted.<br />
Th e quote strongly displays a k<strong>in</strong>d of dualism present <strong>in</strong> the discussions surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the history of new media research which some authors describe as a tension between<br />
technological and cultural determ<strong>in</strong>ism (Lister et al., 2009). Th e quote obviously falls<br />
<strong>in</strong>to one category of technological determ<strong>in</strong>ism because it predicts that a complexly<br />
fragmented and hybrid technical medium such as the Internet will cause or have a<br />
direct impact on an even more multifaceted legal, political and social phenomenon<br />
such as <strong>free</strong>dom. Of course we could debate whether Bush was th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
democracy or market <strong>free</strong>dom which would make US companies benefi t from it.<br />
Regardless of his <strong>in</strong>tentions we know today that the Internet as a technical medium is<br />
spread<strong>in</strong>g rapidly <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a but the state has developed some of the most sophisticated<br />
censor<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms (technical and social) <strong>in</strong> eff orts to control it.<br />
Th e Ch<strong>in</strong>ese case clearly po<strong>in</strong>ts to a complex <strong>in</strong>terconnection between pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
social structures, cultural conceptions and technological capabilities and potentials.<br />
Th is <strong>in</strong>terconnection between the social, cultural and technological has <strong>in</strong> recent<br />
years been further emphasized by the <strong>in</strong>fl uences and the rise of the so-called social<br />
media which br<strong>in</strong>g social and cultural aspects to the fore. Th ese new types of social<br />
media are Web 2.01 websites which facilitate, enable and possess the potential for<br />
social action, <strong>in</strong>teraction, communication and identity <strong>format</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> cyberspace (Bruns<br />
and Bahnisch, 2009: 7) as well as supplement<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>fl uenc<strong>in</strong>g offl <strong>in</strong>e social and<br />
cultural processes. Among global leaders are such websites as Facebook, YouTube or<br />
Wikipedia. Th ey are, however, not entirely new, s<strong>in</strong>ce they are part of a long-term<br />
process of socializ<strong>in</strong>g cyberspace and populat<strong>in</strong>g it with human communication <strong>in</strong> a<br />
process which can be tracked down to early virtual and onl<strong>in</strong>e communities. 2 What is<br />
1 For the lack of a better term we use the term Web 2.0. However, it should be said that its orig<strong>in</strong><br />
lies <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g strategies attempt<strong>in</strong>g to revitalize the US economy aft er the Wall Street dotcom<br />
bubble crash <strong>in</strong> 2000 and 2001. Th e new and restructured web companies started us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
more fl exible bus<strong>in</strong>ess models <strong>in</strong> attract<strong>in</strong>g audiences and users to their platforms. Th e term<br />
was orig<strong>in</strong>ally formulated by media expert and market<strong>in</strong>g consultant Tim O´Reilly. For more<br />
details see O´Reilly, 2005.<br />
2 For an outl<strong>in</strong>e of the early development of virtual communities see Rhe<strong>in</strong>gold, 2000.