23.12.2012 Views

Final Report Pilot Project - Relaciones Internacionales de la ...

Final Report Pilot Project - Relaciones Internacionales de la ...

Final Report Pilot Project - Relaciones Internacionales de la ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A number of other mechanisms for tackling problems of «knowledge /<br />

core curricu<strong>la</strong> / content» of (higher) education systems has been <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

such as the (British) Q.A.A. document on education studies. This document<br />

explicitly stresses that it is not a curriculum, but <strong>de</strong>fines «benchmark<br />

statements» <strong>de</strong>scribing assumptions on the structure of the discipline. In<br />

addition this mo<strong>de</strong>l focuses on «<strong>de</strong>monstrated achievements» (learning<br />

outcomes) of stu<strong>de</strong>nts. The Q.A.A. approach might provi<strong>de</strong> input for<br />

problem solving within the Tuning project:<br />

—Definition of a basic frame of the discipline (nature of the subject)<br />

—Definition of some basic content areas and concepts including<br />

«transferable skills» (<strong>de</strong>fining principles and subject strands)<br />

—Definition of some basic principles for learning, teaching and<br />

assessment<br />

—List of benchmark statements<br />

One may ask a number of questions as regards an adoption or<br />

adaptation of the approach submitted by Q.A.A.:<br />

—Does this structure <strong>de</strong>fined remain too general on one si<strong>de</strong> and<br />

at the same time too specific on another?<br />

—Has this mo<strong>de</strong>l a cultural bias?<br />

—Who (which interest- and power groups) <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s on the «nature<br />

of the subject» and the «<strong>de</strong>fining principles and subject strands»?<br />

—How can benchmark statements be combined with curriculum<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment at an institutional level?<br />

As discussed in the Green Paper on Teacher Education in Europe, the<br />

following components need consi<strong>de</strong>ration when p<strong>la</strong>nning «knowledge /<br />

core curricu<strong>la</strong> / content» in the field of teacher education- and education<br />

studies:<br />

—Analysis of the professional roles teachers and graduates of<br />

educational studies are expected to fulfil <strong>de</strong>pending on normative<br />

<strong>de</strong>cisions within particu<strong>la</strong>r cultural and social contexts.<br />

—Analysis of professional tasks of teachers and graduates of<br />

educational studies (e.g. teaching, educating, counselling,<br />

evaluating, innovating, researching)<br />

—Analysis of qualifications necessary to fulfil professional roles and<br />

tasks (e.g. subject - specific or transferable qualifications)<br />

—Adoption of explicit mo<strong>de</strong>ls of how these qualifications may be<br />

acquired (e.g. learning cultures and learning environments,<br />

teaching/learning strategies)<br />

—Orientation of programs of study on professional roles, tasks and<br />

qualifications analysed.<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!