24.12.2012 Views

UNDERGRADUATE CATALOG - UMUC Europe

UNDERGRADUATE CATALOG - UMUC Europe

UNDERGRADUATE CATALOG - UMUC Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RigHts And REsPonsibilitiEs oF tHE studEnt<br />

ACAdEmiC intEgRity<br />

Integrity in teaching and learning is a fundamental principle<br />

of a university. <strong>UMUC</strong> believes that all members of the<br />

university community share the responsibility for academic<br />

integrity, as expressed in the University System of Maryland<br />

“Policy on Faculty, Student, and Institutional Rights and<br />

Responsibilities for Academic Integrity.” This policy may be<br />

found in Section III, Academic Affairs, of the USM policies<br />

and procedures at<br />

www.usmd.edu/regents/bylaws/SectionIII/III100.html.<br />

At <strong>UMUC</strong>, faculty members are expected to establish<br />

classroom environments conducive to the maintenance of<br />

academic integrity by promptly giving students a complete<br />

syllabus (in <strong>UMUC</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>, faculty members make their<br />

syllabi available online by the first day of registration)<br />

describing the course and its requirements, grading submitted<br />

work promptly and adequately, and arranging appropriate<br />

testing conditions, including examinations monitored by<br />

faculty members in face-to-face (on-site) classes.<br />

Students at <strong>UMUC</strong> are expected to conduct themselves<br />

in a manner that will contribute to the maintenance of<br />

academic integrity. Failure to maintain academic integrity<br />

(e.g., academic dishonesty) may result in disciplinary action.<br />

Students are responsible for understanding and avoiding<br />

academic dishonesty and plagiarism, whether intentional or<br />

unintentional. The definitions of academic dishonesty and the<br />

procedures for pursuing complaints of academic dishonesty<br />

are described in <strong>UMUC</strong> Policy 150.25, “Academic Dishonesty<br />

and Plagiarism,” which can be found at<br />

www.umuc.edu/policy/aa15025.shtml. It is also available in<br />

Appendix H of this Catalog.<br />

APPEAling A gRAdE<br />

College and university students inevitably encounter faculty<br />

members who vary widely in teaching philosophy and<br />

demeanor and who use different teaching styles. Not only is<br />

teaching influenced by course content, there are also many<br />

ways of conveying the same material. It is only natural that<br />

students will like the style and personality of some faculty<br />

members more than others. Disagreement with a faculty<br />

member over demeanor and teaching style, however, is not<br />

grounds for a grade appeal. Students have the opportunity to<br />

express their opinions on these matters through the course<br />

evaluation forms they complete for every <strong>UMUC</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />

course.<br />

Regardless of teaching style, it may happen that a student<br />

believes a faculty member’s determination of a final course<br />

grade has been arbitrary and capricious. The phrase “arbitrary<br />

and capricious grading” is defined in <strong>UMUC</strong> Policy 130.80<br />

(in Appendix F) as:<br />

G A final course grade assigned on some basis other than<br />

performance in the course; or<br />

G A final course grade assigned by resorting to unreasonable<br />

standards different from those that were applied to other<br />

students in that course; or<br />

G A final course grade assigned by a substantial,<br />

unreasonable, or unannounced departure from the faculty<br />

member’s previously articulated grading standards.<br />

A student who believes his or her final grade to be the result of<br />

arbitrary and capricious grading should first confer promptly<br />

with the faculty member of the course. There is a time limit<br />

on appealing a grade; students who want to appeal a grade<br />

must initiate the process within 30 days of the posting of the<br />

grade.<br />

If the student has not been able to contact the faculty member<br />

after a reasonable effort, or if the student and faculty member<br />

cannot, after consultation, reach a satisfactory resolution,<br />

the student may file a written request with the appeal<br />

administrator (the associate dean, <strong>UMUC</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>) asking<br />

how the final grade was calculated. If the course was offered<br />

via distance education, the student may also ask the director,<br />

Distance Education for information.<br />

Procedures for appealing a grade are detailed in <strong>UMUC</strong> Policy<br />

130.80, “Procedures for Review of Alleged Arbitrary and<br />

Capricious Grading.” This can be found in Appendix F of this<br />

Catalog and at www.ed.umuc.edu/policy/aa13080.shtml.<br />

www.ed.umuc.edu 35<br />

RiGHTs And<br />

REsPonsiBiLiTiEs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!