27.12.2012 Views

l - People

l - People

l - People

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The results for this protein are shown in Figure 4.5. HingeMaster makes a strong<br />

prediction for a hinge at residue 332 (StoneHinge TLSMD, hNMb, and hNMd in<br />

agreement). This chain location does not appear in the HAG, but a search of the literature<br />

uncovered evidence for a hinge at this location. Lactoferrin is organized into two<br />

homologous halves, named the N and C lobes. Each of these lobes is further subdivided<br />

into two domains: N1 and N2 in the N lobe and C1 and C2 in the C lobe. The opening of<br />

these domains exposes an iron binding site in each lobe. The motion selected for Hinge<br />

Atlas Gold shows the N1 domain (in blue) rotating relative to the rest of the molecule<br />

exposing the binding site in the N-lobe. Thus, the HAG hinges are located between the<br />

N1 and N2 domains. The hinge most strongly predicted by Hinge Master, however, falls<br />

in between the C1 and N2 lobes and contributes to the movement of the two lobes<br />

relative to each other. As in the case of Troponin C, experimental evidence is found for<br />

this hinge, as lactoferrin crystals grown at 277 and 303 K show rotation between the two<br />

lobes (Karthikeyan et al).<br />

None of the predictive measures identify a hinge point at 90/91 in the open form<br />

structure. However TLSMD analysis of the closed form of the same protein (PDB entry<br />

1LFH; Morph ID f964705-18231) finds segment boundaries at 91/92 and 249/250 for the<br />

3-segment partition, corresponding exactly to the lactoferrin mobile domain boundaries<br />

(not shown).<br />

Discussion<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!