27.12.2012 Views

l - People

l - People

l - People

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

strikingly similar both to the holo (inset 5.7.d) and to the starting structure (inset 5.7.b).<br />

This striking success at correctly predicting that the open form is the holo for this ligand<br />

indicates that we have included some of the physically important phenomena in our<br />

fitness function.<br />

Discussion<br />

Prediction of protein conformational change<br />

For Biotin carboxylase and Glutamine binding protein, large scale motions of the M<br />

domain are required for binding, and computational expense makes predicting them by<br />

Molecular Dynamics impractical for many applications. We showed that in the ligand<br />

binding application our method generates and correctly identifies the bound conformation<br />

of GlnBP, with an sRMSD dropping from 15.7Å for the starting or apo structure down to<br />

3.6Å for the predicted structure. For biotin carboxylase, sequence differences between<br />

the holo and starting structures limited the structural alignment somewhat, but the closed<br />

conformation was nonetheless clearly predicted, with sRMSD dropping from 14.8Å to<br />

7.0Å. For MurA, minimal domain motion was required for binding, and this was also<br />

predicted correctly, with sRMSD remaining constant at around 5Å. (Table 1).<br />

Potential applications and future work<br />

261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!