27.12.2012 Views

l - People

l - People

l - People

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

potential for simplification, motion prediction for these has remained largely an unsolved<br />

problem. We resolve the motion by first detecting the hinge, then accelerating the rigid<br />

body motions of the domains.<br />

Early evolutionary studies indicated that the stabilizing interactions within domains were<br />

more important than interactions at the hinge. This was consistent with the general<br />

consensus that structural domains are independently stable. Our first method for<br />

detecting the domain boundaries consisted of breaking the protein into two fragments by<br />

making some of the many possible combinations of two cuts on the backbone and then<br />

separating the resulting two fragments (one continuous and one discontinuous[112]) and<br />

computing their stabilities. We found that indeed the cuts that coincided with the hinge<br />

resulted in the most stable fragments.<br />

In a second method, we studied the correlations of atoms assuming a Hookean potential.<br />

Under these circumstances not only the spectral decomposition but also the equipartition<br />

theorem apply. The motional correlations of residues in a thermal ensemble generated in<br />

the eigenvector basis were analyzed with a view to finding a single domain of maximal<br />

size with high average interresidue correlation.<br />

Additional methods were developed, and some existing methods were tested. In Chapter<br />

4 we integrate all of these into a single combined method which emits several hinge<br />

predictions and assigns a confidence score to each.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!