27.12.2012 Views

l - People

l - People

l - People

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The morph trajectory was sterically reasonable, i.e. chains were not broken in the attempt<br />

to interpolate motion.<br />

We found that FlexProt’s Maximal[43, 44] RMSD (Root Mean Square Deviation)<br />

parameter had a strong effect on the results. Therefore when FlexProt gave visibly<br />

incorrect results for a given morph, we reran the program, systematically varying this<br />

parameter. If for one of these runs the program’s hinge identification was consistent with<br />

the observed motion observed in the morph movie, the annotation for that morph was<br />

entered into the database. We discarded immediately those morphs that did not exhibit<br />

clear hinge bending motion. Lastly, we removed redundant morphs using nrdb90[22].<br />

Note that the definition of a hinge given in the introduction allows for a hinge of zero<br />

length. FlexProt indeed often returned such hinges. To deal with this, in all cases one<br />

residue on each side of the hinge, was taken to also belong to the hinge. Thus most<br />

hinges are two residues long. At the end of this process, the computer annotated set<br />

contained 273 morphs.<br />

As described, the computer annotation of hinges requires significant human intervention<br />

and the results were often debatable. Many of the hinge annotations differed slightly but<br />

visibly from the boundary between rigid domains, such that the backbone flexions that<br />

could account for the domain motion were not seen in the predicted hinge region. In<br />

other cases hinges were missed, and some annotations appeared where no hinge existed.<br />

The more flagrantly misannotated hinges were removed from the dataset, but making the<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!