31.12.2012 Views

Bulgaria - The social impact of seasonal migration

Bulgaria - The social impact of seasonal migration

Bulgaria - The social impact of seasonal migration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

Executive Summary<br />

<strong>The</strong> report follows the main guidelines <strong>of</strong> the comparative research outline designed by<br />

IOM-Vienna: brief introduction to the problem from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> introducing<br />

historical background, the statistical development over the past five years (1997 to<br />

2001), the legal and administrative provisions with regard to <strong>migration</strong> and <strong>migration</strong><br />

management, trying to find answers to the main question <strong>of</strong> the study: How does<br />

<strong>migration</strong> affect the local society in <strong>Bulgaria</strong> at this point <strong>of</strong> time?<br />

<strong>The</strong> report analyses both out-<strong>migration</strong> and in-<strong>migration</strong> trends, but in the <strong>Bulgaria</strong>n case<br />

what seems clear is that out-<strong>migration</strong> exceeds in-<strong>migration</strong>, thus e<strong>migration</strong> rather than<br />

im<strong>migration</strong> has bigger <strong>impact</strong> on the <strong>Bulgaria</strong>n society. <strong>The</strong> public discourse is<br />

dominated by concerns about brain-drain, the economic benefits from <strong>Bulgaria</strong>n<br />

migrants working abroad temporarily, the possibilities for exporting skilled labour<br />

legally, and the harm inflicted by returned asylum-seekers on <strong>Bulgaria</strong>'s image.<br />

Immigrants are not particularly visible yet, and concerns about their number, protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> their rights, xenophobia or their integration come rarely to the fore. That is why, in<br />

searching for the <strong>social</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>migration</strong> on the <strong>Bulgaria</strong>n society, the <strong>Bulgaria</strong>n team<br />

will pay more attention to out-<strong>migration</strong> than to in-<strong>migration</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> report is based on secondary analysis <strong>of</strong> relevant literature (Appendix 1);<br />

normative documents, regulating <strong>migration</strong>; statistical and border police data about<br />

<strong>migration</strong> (Appendix 2); sociological surveys on potential <strong>migration</strong> and on the<br />

economic <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>migration</strong>; interviews with representatives <strong>of</strong> state institutions and<br />

NGOs dealing with <strong>migration</strong>, as well as with immigrants and emigrants (Appendix 3).<br />

Main conclusions and recommendations:<br />

I. Current <strong>migration</strong> trends differ significantly from the pre-1989 tendencies.<br />

As a whole, from 1880 to 1988, around 1 283 000 people emigrated from <strong>Bulgaria</strong>, while<br />

808 600 immigrated to the country. In that period, in-<strong>migration</strong> included mainly ethnic<br />

<strong>Bulgaria</strong>ns living on the territories <strong>of</strong> neighbouring countries, while the main waves <strong>of</strong><br />

out-<strong>migration</strong> were comprised mostly <strong>of</strong> ethnic minorities living in <strong>Bulgaria</strong>,<br />

predominantly ethnic Turks. <strong>The</strong> main reasons for both out- and in- <strong>migration</strong> were<br />

political. In-<strong>migration</strong> flows now include more refugees and foreign immigrants, while<br />

out-<strong>migration</strong> has no such clearly expressed ethnic pr<strong>of</strong>ile – it is characteristic for all the<br />

ethnic groups inhabiting <strong>Bulgaria</strong> nowadays. <strong>The</strong> main reasons for e<strong>migration</strong> now are<br />

economic.<br />

<strong>The</strong> historical heritage has the following consequences for the current <strong>migration</strong><br />

patterns:<br />

Firstly, the <strong>Bulgaria</strong>n community abroad is quite diversified, including different <strong>social</strong><br />

groups, with different ethnic origin and different motives for e<strong>migration</strong>. <strong>The</strong> notion <strong>of</strong><br />

different groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bulgaria</strong>ns living abroad has been embedded in the new law on<br />

<strong>Bulgaria</strong>ns living outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bulgaria</strong> (<strong>of</strong> 11 April 2000), which introduces the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

"<strong>Bulgaria</strong>n community abroad". <strong>The</strong> political use <strong>of</strong> the term “<strong>Bulgaria</strong>n community<br />

abroad” is helpful, but for analytical purposes and in the process <strong>of</strong> elaborating<br />

concrete policies, it has to be differentiated in order to explain the specific<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the different groups which ought to be treated in a different political

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!