05.01.2013 Views

Dialogue Editing

Dialogue Editing

Dialogue Editing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How We Got Where We Are 7<br />

It was clear to all that a method of showing sound and picture was of<br />

great commercial interest. In the late 1880s, Edison and his associate, W.K.L.<br />

Dickson, linked the Edison cylinder phonograph with a larger tube that was<br />

slotted much like the Zoetrope. It wasn’t elegant, but it did produce synchronized<br />

images and sound. 3 Georges Demeny, in 1891, claimed to produce a<br />

synchronous sound system, but like so many assertions in this time of riotous<br />

invention, this proved unfounded. There were many other attempts to add<br />

sound to the ever more popular moving picture, but at least three impediments<br />

came between a successful marriage of sound and picture: reliable<br />

synchronization, amplifi cation, and the fact that silent pictures were so effective<br />

and popular.<br />

Early Attempts at Sound in Movies<br />

Many early sound movies were merely prerecorded playback tracks to which<br />

“silent” actors mimed. By the 1920s, when commercial talkies were a real<br />

possibility, sound playback was usually from a phonograph synchronized to<br />

the fi lm projector via belts, pulleys, and cogs. The most successful interlocked<br />

phonograph/projector system was the Vitaphone, made by Western Electric<br />

and Bell Laboratories. But this double-system playback failed completely in<br />

the event of a fi lm break or a skip in the record. The projectionist had no<br />

choice but to return to the beginning of the reel. Eugene Augustin Lauste<br />

patented a form of optical fi lm soundtrack in 1910, but it would be another<br />

20 years before optical recording was adopted for fi lm sound. 4<br />

Amplifi cation of disk or cylinder recordings posed a hurdle, since early phonographs<br />

played their sounds acoustically rather than through amplifi cation—hardly<br />

appropriate for large halls. The German Tri-Ergon sound-on-fi lm<br />

system, later improved on by American Lee De Forest, enabled a sound reader<br />

to convert variations in the optical track into a signal that could be amplifi ed<br />

by valve amplifi ers newly improved by the Marconi company and others.<br />

This was the beginning of a standard for sound reproduction that would last<br />

more than 50 years—optical sound printed directly onto the fi lmprint.<br />

But there was one more hurdle to clear in order to bring sound movies out<br />

of the “gee whiz” ghetto and into commercial success. Simply stated, silent<br />

pictures worked. By the mid-1920s silent fi lms had established a language<br />

and an audience and were rightly considered both entertainment for the<br />

3 Mark Ulano. “Moving Pictures That Talk, Part 2: The Movies Are Born a Child of the<br />

Phonograph” (http://www.fi lmsound.org/ulano/index.html).<br />

4 David A. Cook. A History of Narrative Film (New York: Norton, 1981, pp. 241–44).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!