14.01.2013 Views

ZMBH J.Bericht 2000 - Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der ...

ZMBH J.Bericht 2000 - Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der ...

ZMBH J.Bericht 2000 - Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

poral requirement for trx in or<strong>der</strong> to achieve normal<br />

expression patterns. We have shown with X-CHIP a<br />

dynamic association of TRX with CMMs and promoters<br />

of the BX-C and found a close cooperation of TRX<br />

with PcG members at CMMs.<br />

Several members of the Drosophila trxG have counterparts<br />

in humans and mice. The mixed-lineage leukaemia<br />

(MLL) gene (also known as ALL-1, HRX), a<br />

TRX homologue, was found through its implication in<br />

the majority of infantile acute lymphocytic and mixed<br />

lineage leukemias. Disruption of the murine Mll gene<br />

by gene targeting causes homeotic transformations of<br />

the vertebrae in heterozygotes and loss of homeotic<br />

gene expression, supporting the notion that Mll is a<br />

functional equivalent of trx.<br />

To date, not much is known at the molecular level<br />

how translocation of MLL with various other chromosomal<br />

locations generate leukemia. At least 23 fusion<br />

MLL proteins involved in leukemia have been identified.<br />

As part of our collaborative efforts with<br />

the Canaani lab, we have generated transgenic flies<br />

expressing full length MLL, and fusion proteins<br />

MLL-AF9, MLL-AF4, and MLL-AF17 un<strong>der</strong> GAL4<br />

control. Expression of these proteins in Drosophila<br />

may reveal their effects by determining with which<br />

pathway in Drosophila development they influence.<br />

Crosses between our transgenic flies and various<br />

GAL4 drivers revealed that only MLL-AF9 and<br />

MLL-AF17 constructs had a slight effect on Drosophila<br />

development. When we took a closer look at the<br />

molecular level, we could not detect the proteins on<br />

Western, but at the RNA level, we see transcripts from<br />

all four constructs. Interestingly, this same effect is<br />

also observed with MLL-AF9 in mouse. We are currently<br />

testing whether overexpression of the murine<br />

proteins results in cell death as recent published observations<br />

link MLL with apoptosis.<br />

100<br />

IV. Drosophila as a model system to identify<br />

components involved in the processing<br />

and the function of the human Amyloid Precursor<br />

Protein<br />

G. Merdes, B. Brückner, DFG (in collaboration<br />

with K. Beyreuther (<strong>ZMBH</strong>))<br />

The human amyloid precursor protein (APP) is an<br />

integral membrane protein with two homologues in<br />

invertebrates: the amyloid protein-like protein 1 (C.<br />

elegans, APL-1) and the amyloid precursor proteinlike<br />

protein (D. melanogaster, APPL). Flies deficient<br />

for expression of APPL show a phototaxis impairment<br />

that can be rescued by the expression of human APP<br />

suggesting an evolutionary conservation of APP function.<br />

The importance of APP in the pathogenesis of<br />

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) became apparent through<br />

the identification of distinct mutations in the gene<br />

causing early onset familial AD. The major component<br />

of the plaques and amyloid found in senile Alzheimer<br />

patients is a proteolytic product of APP, the<br />

βA4 peptide. APP is cleaved in vivo by several proteases<br />

termed α−, β−, and γ−secretase. Cleavage of<br />

APP by the α−secretase prevents the production of<br />

βA4. Despite the availability of APP-null mutants and<br />

transgenic mice expressing human APP, the physiological<br />

role of APP remains unknown and many factors<br />

involved in the processing of APP have not yet<br />

been clearly identified. Therefore we have established<br />

Drosophila melanogaster as a model system to study<br />

the function and processing of APP.<br />

Various forms of human APP were expressed in<br />

Drosophila tissue culture cells as well as in transgenic<br />

fly lines. Studies in both systems revealed that also in<br />

flies APP is processed in a similar way as in mammalian<br />

cells in regard to the α- and γ-cleavages. In addition,<br />

transgenic flies expressing full-length forms of<br />

APP in the wing imaginal discs are characterized by a<br />

blistered-wing phenotype, suggesting that the expression<br />

of human APP interferes with the cell adhesion<br />

between the dorsal and ventral epithelial cell monolayers<br />

of the wing (Figure 3). To define the involvement<br />

of APP in the blistered wing phenotype in more<br />

detail as well as to identify factors involved in the processing<br />

of APP, we perform biochemical and genetic<br />

studies. Since the observed wing phenotype depends<br />

on full-length APP, an increased processing of APP,<br />

e.g. by the simultaneous overexpression of an APPspecific<br />

protease, results in a suppression of the phenotype.<br />

This observation enables us to identify proteins<br />

involved in the processing of APP by the use of<br />

genetic screens and to subsequently identify the corresponding<br />

mammalian homologues. In a similar way,<br />

gene products required for the effect of APP on cell<br />

adhesion and therefore for APP function, can also be<br />

identified by genetic screens. Mutations in these genes<br />

result in suppression or an enhancement of the blis-<br />

tered wing phenotype, dependent on their function.<br />

Drosophila can be mutagenized by the use of chemicals<br />

or by the use of the transposable P-element.<br />

The advantage of P-element mutagenesis is the easier<br />

identification of the mutagenized genes by isolating<br />

and sequencing the flanking genomic DNA. Therefore<br />

we have recently performed a P-element based genetic<br />

screen as well as screened collections of already existing<br />

Drosophila mutants. The analysis of 150 000 flies<br />

with potential new P-element insertion sites resulted<br />

in the isolation of several enhancer- and suppressormutations,<br />

together with several genes interfering with<br />

wing patterning. The corresponding genes, which we<br />

are currently characterizing further, encode factors<br />

involved in signal transduction, maintenance of cell<br />

shape and cell adhesion, and protein processing.<br />

We utilize the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as<br />

a genetic model system. Since Thomas Hunt Morgan<br />

introduced Drosophila as a model organism into genetics<br />

at the beginning of this century and isolated the<br />

Figure 3. Expression of different<br />

isoforms of human APP in transgenic<br />

Drosophila. Only full-length<br />

APP result in a blistered wing<br />

phenotype.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!