17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The map ϕǫ is a homeomorphism of Σ + onto itself, it is biholomophic in the interior, it preserves<br />

the upper part of the boundary i +Ê+ , while it slides the left part i[0, 1] and the lower partÊ+<br />

by moving the corner point 0 into the real positive number<br />

α(ǫ) := − i<br />

arccos(1 + 2ǫ).<br />

π<br />

The function ǫ ↦→ α(ǫ) is invertible, and we denote by α ↦→ ǫ(α) its inverse. Moreover, ϕǫ converges<br />

to the identity uniformly on compact subsets of Σ + for ǫ → 0. An explicit computation shows<br />

that<br />

If u : Σ + → T ∗Ê2n and α > 0, we define<br />

ϕ ′ ǫ − 1 → 0 in Lp (Σ + ), if 1 < p < 4. (185)<br />

v(z) := u(ϕ ǫ(α)(z)).<br />

Since ϕǫ is holomorphic, ∂(u ◦ ϕǫ) = ϕ ′ ǫ · ∂u ◦ ϕǫ. Therefore, u solves the equation (181) if and<br />

only if v solves the equation<br />

Given 2 < p < 4, we set<br />

∂v(z) + ϕ ′ ǫ(α) (z)f(λ, ϕ ǫ(α)(z), v(z)) = 0. (186)<br />

W 1,p<br />

∗ (Σ + , T ∗Ê2n ) = � v ∈ W 1,p (Σ + , T ∗Ê2n ) | v(s, 0) ∈ N ∗ ∆Ên ∀s ≥ 0,<br />

and we consider the operator<br />

v(s, 1) ∈ N ∗ (0) ∀s ≥ 0, v(0, t) ∈ N ∗ (0) ∀t ∈ [0, 1] � ,<br />

F : [0, +∞[×Êk × W 1,p<br />

∗ (Σ + , T ∗Ê2n ) → L p (Σ + , T ∗Ê2n ), F(α, λ, v) = ∂v + ϕ ′ ǫ(α) f(λ, ϕ ǫ(α)(·), v),<br />

where ϕ0 = id. The problem of finding (α, ũ) in � M K Υ (γ1, γ2; x) with ũ close to ũ 0 is equivalent<br />

to finding zeroes of the operator F of the form (α, λ, v) with α > 0. By (185), the operator<br />

F is continuous, and its differential D (λ,v)F with respect to the variables (λ, v) is continuous.<br />

The transversality assumption that ũ 0 is a non-degenerate solution of problem � M Ω K (γ1, γ2; x) is<br />

translated into the fact that D (λ,v)F(0, 0, 0) is an isomorphism. Then the parametric inverse<br />

maping theorem implies that there is a unique curve α ↦→ (λ(α), v(α)), 0 < α < α0, converging to<br />

(0, 0) for α → 0, and such that (λ(α), v(α)) is the unique zero of F(α, ·, ·) in a neighborhood of<br />

(0, 0). This concludes the proof of statement (ii).<br />

6.5 Proof of Proposition 4.7<br />

The setting. We recall the setting of section 4.4. Let γ1 ∈ P(L1), γ2 ∈ P(L2), and x ∈<br />

P Θ (H1 ⊕H2). If α ≥ 0, M K α (γ1, γ2; x) is the space of solutions u : [0, +∞[×[0, 1] → T ∗ M 2 of the<br />

equation<br />

satisfying the boundary conditions<br />

∂H1⊕H2,J(u) = 0, (187)<br />

π ◦ u(0, ·) ∈ W u (γ1; −grad g1ËΛ L1 ) × W u (γ2; −grad g2ËΛ L2 ), (188)<br />

(u(s, 0), −u(s, 1)) ∈ N ∗ ∆M×M if 0 ≤ s < α, (189)<br />

(u(s, 0), −u(s, 1)) ∈ N ∗ ∆ Θ M if s ≥ α, (190)<br />

99<br />

lim u(s, ·) = x. (191)<br />

s→+∞

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!