You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The orbits of −grad(f1 ⊕f2) are just pairs of orbits of −gradf1 and −gradf2, so the Morse-Smale<br />
condition holds. If we fix orientations for the unstable manifold of each critical point of f1, f2, and<br />
we endow the unstable manifold of each (x1, x2) ∈ crit(f1 ⊕ f2),<br />
W u ((x1, x2)) = W u (x1) × W u (x2),<br />
with the product orientation, we see that the boundary operator in the Morse complex of (f1 ⊕<br />
f2, g1 × g2) is given by<br />
∂(x1, x2) = (∂x1, x2) + (−1) m(x1) (x1, ∂x2), ∀xi ∈ crit(fi), i = 1, 2.<br />
We conclude that the Morse complex of (f1 ⊕ f2, g1 × g2) is the tensor product of the Morse<br />
complexes of (f1, g1) and (f2, g2). So, using the natural homomorphism from the tensor product of<br />
the homology of two chain complexes to the homology of the tensor product of the two complexes,<br />
we obtain the homomorphism<br />
HjM(f1, g1) ⊗ HkM(f2, g2) → Hj+kM(f1 ⊕ f2, g1 × g2). (12)<br />
We claim that this homomorphism corresponds to the exterior product homomorphism<br />
Hj(M1) ⊗ Hk(M2) ×<br />
−→ Hj+k(M1 × M2), (13)<br />
via the isomorphism between Morse homology and singular homology described in section 2.1.<br />
Indeed, the cellular filtration in M1 × M2 can be chosen to be generated by small product<br />
neighborhoods of the critical points,<br />
W ℓ =<br />
�<br />
(x1,x2)∈crit(f1⊕f2)<br />
m(x1)+m(x2)=ℓ<br />
φ 1 ([0, +∞[×U1(x1)) × φ 2 ([0, +∞[×U2(x2)) = �<br />
j+k=ℓ<br />
U j<br />
1 × Uk 2 .<br />
By excision and by the Kunneth theorem, together with the fact that we are dealing with free<br />
Abelian groups, one easily obtains that<br />
WℓW = Hℓ(W ℓ , W ℓ−1 ) ∼ = �<br />
j+k=ℓ<br />
Hj(U j<br />
1 , Uj−1 1 ) ⊗ Hk(U k 2 , Uk−1 2 ),<br />
and that the boundary homomorphism of the cellular filtration W is the tensor product of the<br />
boundary homomorphisms of the cellular filtrations U1 and U2. Passing to homology, we find that<br />
(12) corresponds to the exterior homology product<br />
Hj(U ∞ 1 ) ⊗ Hk(U ∞ 2 ) ×<br />
−→ Hj+k(U ∞ 1 × U ∞ 2 ) = Hj+k(W ∞ ),<br />
by the usual identification of the cellular complex to the Morse complex induced by a choice of<br />
orientations for the unstable manifolds. But since the inclusion U ∞ 1 ֒→ M1 and U ∞ 2 ֒→ M2 are<br />
homotopy equivalences, we conclude that (12) corresponds to (13).<br />
2.4 Intersection products<br />
Let M0 be a Hilbert manifold, and let π : E → M0 be a smooth n-dimensional oriented real<br />
vector bundle over M0. It is easy to describe the Thom isomorphism<br />
τ : Hk(E, E \ M0) ∼ =<br />
−→ Hk−n(M0), α ↦→ τE ∩ α,<br />
in a Morse theoretical way (τE ∈ H n (E, E \ M0) denotes the Thom class of the vector bundle E).<br />
Indeed, let g0 be a complete metric on M0 and let f0 ∈ F(M0, g0) be such that −gradf0<br />
satisfies the Morse-Smale condition. The choice of a Riemannian structure on the vector bundle<br />
E determines a class of product-type metrics g1 on the manifold E, and a smooth function<br />
f1(ξ) := f0(π(ξ)) − |ξ| 2 , ∀ξ ∈ E.<br />
14