You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
When µ Θ (y) = µ Λ (x1) + µ Λ (x2) − n, ME(x1, x2; y) is a finite set of oriented points, and<br />
we denote by nE(x1, x2; y) the algebraic sum of the corresponding orientation signs. Similarly,<br />
when µ Λ (z) = µ Θ (y), MG(y, z) is a finite set of oriented points, and we denote by nG(y, z) the<br />
algebraic sum of the corresponding orientation signs. These integers are the coefficients of the<br />
homomorphisms<br />
E : F Λ h (H1) ⊗ F Λ k (H2) → F Θ h+k−n (H1 ⊕ H2), x1 ⊗ x2 ↦→ �<br />
nE(x1, x2; y)y,<br />
y∈P Θ (H1⊕H2)<br />
µ Θ (y)=h+k−n<br />
G : F Θ k (H1 ⊕ H2) → F Λ k (H1#H2), y ↦→ �<br />
z∈P Λ (H1#H2)<br />
µ Λ (z)=k<br />
nG(y, z)z.<br />
A standard gluing argument shows that these homomorphisms are chain maps. The main result<br />
of this section states that the pair-of-pants product on T ∗ M factors through the Floer homology<br />
of figure-8 loops:<br />
3.11. Theorem. The chain maps<br />
Υ Λ , G ◦ E : � F Λ (H1, J) ⊗ F Λ (H2, J) �<br />
are chain homotopic.<br />
k<br />
= �<br />
j+h=k<br />
F Λ j (H1, J) ⊗ F Λ h (H2, J) → F Λ k−n(H1#H2, J)<br />
In order to prove the above theorem, we must construct a homomorphism<br />
P Υ GE : � F Λ (H1, J) ⊗ F Λ (H2, J) �<br />
k → F Λ k−n+1 (H1#H2, J),<br />
such that<br />
(Υ Λ − G ◦ E)(α ⊗ β) = ∂ Λ J,H1#H2 ◦ P Υ GE (α ⊗ β) + P Υ � Λ<br />
GE ∂ α ⊗ β + (−1) J,H1 h α ⊗ ∂ Λ J,H2β� , (47)<br />
for every α ∈ F Λ h (H1) and β ∈ F Λ j (H2). The chain homotopy P Υ GE is defined by counting solutions<br />
of the Floer equation on a one-parameter family of Riemann surfaces with boundary Σ Υ GE (α),<br />
α ∈]0, +∞[, obtained by removing two open disks from the pair-of-pants.<br />
More precisely, given α ∈]0, +∞[, we define ΣΥ GE (α) as the quotient of the disjoint union<br />
(Ê×[−1, 0]) ⊔ (Ê×[0, 1] under the identifications<br />
�<br />
− (s, −1) ∼ (s, 0 )<br />
(s, 0 + ) ∼ (s, 1)<br />
if s ≤ 0,<br />
�<br />
(s, −1) ∼ (s, 1)<br />
(s, 0− ) ∼ (s, 0 + )<br />
if s ≥ α.<br />
This object is a Riemann surface with boundary, with the holomorphic coordinates (42) and (43)<br />
at (0, −1) ∼ (0, 0 − ) and at (0, 0 + ) ∼ (0, 1), with the holomorphic coordinates (36) and (44)<br />
(translated by α) at (α, 0) and at (α, −1) ∼ (α, 1). The resulting object is a Riemann surface with<br />
three cylindrical ends, and two boundary circles.<br />
Given x1 ∈ P Λ (H1), x2 ∈ P Λ (H2), and z ∈ P Λ (H1#H2), we define M Υ GE (x1, x2; z) to be<br />
the space of pairs (α, u), with α > 0 and u ∈ C ∞ (Σ Υ GE (α), T ∗ M) solution of<br />
∂J,H(u) = 0,<br />
with boundary conditions<br />
� πu(s, −1) = πu(s, 0 − ) = πu(s, 0 + ) = πu(s, 1),<br />
u(s, 0 − ) − u(s, −1) + u(s, 1) − u(s, 0 + ) = 0,<br />
and asymptotic conditions<br />
∀s ∈ [0, α],<br />
lim<br />
s→−∞ u(s, t − 1) = x1(t), lim<br />
s→−∞ u(s, t) = x2(t), lim u(s, 2t − 1) = z(t),<br />
s→+∞<br />
uniformly in t ∈ [0, 1]. The following result is proved in section 5.10.<br />
35