17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5 The right-hand square is homotopy commutative<br />

In this section we prove that the chain maps ΦΛ L1#L2 ◦ MΓ and G ◦ ΦΘ are both homotopic to<br />

L1⊕L2<br />

a third chain map, named KΘ . This fact implies that the right-hand square in the diagram (53)<br />

commutes up to chain homotopy.<br />

The chain map KΘ is defined by using the following spaces of solutions of the Floer equation<br />

on the half-cylinder for the Hamiltonian H1#H2: given γ ∈ PΘ (L1 ⊕ L2) and x ∈ PΛ (H1#H2),<br />

set<br />

M Θ �<br />

K (γ; x) := u ∈ C ∞ ([0, +∞[×Ì, T ∗ �<br />

�<br />

M) �∂J,H1#H2(u) = 0,<br />

π ◦ u(0, ·) ∈ Γ � W u (γ; −grad gΘËΘ L1⊕L2 ) � �<br />

, lim u(s, ·) = x uniformly in t .<br />

s→+∞<br />

By Theorem 3.2 in [AS06b] (or by the arguments of section 5.10), the space M Θ K (γ; x) is a smooth<br />

manifold of dimension<br />

dimM Θ K(γ; x) = m Θ (γ) − µ Λ (x),<br />

for a generic choice of g Θ , H1, and H2. These manifolds carry coherent orientations.<br />

Compactness follows from the energy estimate<br />

�<br />

]0,+∞[×Ì|∂su(s, t)| 2 dsdt ≤ËL1⊕L2(γ) −�H1#H2(x),<br />

implied by (49). Counting the elements of the zero-dimensional spaces, we define a homomorphism<br />

K Θ : Mj(ËΘ L1⊕L2 , g Θ ) → F Λ j (H1#H2, J),<br />

which is shown to be a chain map.<br />

It is easy to construct a chain homotopy P Γ K between ΦΛ L1#L2 ◦MΓ and K Θ by considering the<br />

space<br />

M Γ �<br />

K(γ; x) := (α, u) ∈]0, +∞[×C ∞ ([0, +∞[×Ì, T ∗ �<br />

�<br />

M) �∂J,H1#H2(u) = 0,<br />

φ Λ −α (π ◦ u(0, ·)) ∈ Γ�W u (γ; −grad gΘËΘ ) L1⊕L2 � �<br />

, lim u(s, ·) = x uniformly in t .<br />

s→+∞<br />

where φ Λ s denotes the flow of −gradËΛ L1#L2 on Λ 1 (M). As before, we find that generically<br />

M Γ K (γ1, γ2; x) is a manifold of dimension<br />

dimM Γ K (γ; x) = mΛ (γ) − µ Θ (x) + 1.<br />

Compactness holds, so an algebraic count of the zero-dimensional spaces produces the homomorphism<br />

P Γ K : Mj(ËΘ L1⊕L2 , g Θ ) → F Λ j+1(H1#H2, J).<br />

A standard gluing argument shows that P Γ K is the required homotopy.<br />

Finally, the construction of the chain homotopy P K G between KΘ and G ◦ ΦΘ is based<br />

L1⊕L2<br />

on the one-parameter family of Riemann surfaces ΣK G (α), α > 0, defined as the quotient of the<br />

disjoint union [0, +∞[×[−1, 0] ⊔ [0, +∞[×[0, 1] under the identifications<br />

(s, 0 − ) ∼ (s, 0 + ) and (s, −1) ∼ (s, 1) for s ≥ α.<br />

This object is a Riemann surface with boundary, the holomorphic structure at (α, 0) being given<br />

by the map<br />

{ζ ∈�|Re ζ ≥ 0, |ζ| < ǫ} → Σ K G (α), ζ ↦→ α + ζ2 ,<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!