17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Since we have applied a conformal rescaling, the energy of vh is uniformly bounded, so (vh) converges<br />

up to a subsequence to some J-holomorphic map v in the C0 loc ([0, +∞[×[0, +∞[, T ∗M4 )<br />

topology (more precisely, we have C∞ loc convergence once the domain [0, +∞[×[0, +∞[ is transformed<br />

by a conformal mapping turning the portion near the boundary point (1, 0) into a neighborhood<br />

of (0, 0) in the upper-right quarterÀ+ =]0, +∞[×]0, +∞[). The J-holomorphic map has<br />

finite energy, so by removal singularities it has a continuous extension at ∞ (again, by Proposition<br />

6.4 together with a suitable conformal change of variables). By (203), (204), and (205) it satisfies<br />

the boundary conditions<br />

π ◦ v(0, t) = (c(0), c(0)) for t ≥ 0, (208)<br />

v(s, 0) ∈ N ∗ ∆M×M for 0 ≤ s ≤ 1, (209)<br />

v(s, 0) ∈ N ∗ ∆ Θ M<br />

for s ≥ 1. (210)<br />

Since the boundary conditions are of conormal type and the Liouville one-form η vanishes on<br />

conormals, we have<br />

|∇v| 2 ds dt = v ∗ (ω) = v ∗ (dη) = dv ∗ �<br />

(η) = v ∗ (η) = 0,<br />

�À+<br />

�À+<br />

�À+<br />

�À+<br />

so v is constant. By (208), π ◦ v = (c(0), c(0)). In particular,<br />

Since<br />

the thesis follows.<br />

∂À+<br />

lim<br />

h→+∞ π ◦ vh(s, 0) = (c(0), c(0)) uniformly in s ∈ [0, 1].<br />

π ◦ vh(s, 0) = π ◦ ũh(αhs, 0) = (π ◦ uh(αhs, 0), π ◦ uh(s, 1)) = (dh(s), dh(s)),<br />

Localization. We fix a positive number A, playing the role of the upper bound for the action.<br />

Then the union of all spaces of solution M K 0 (γ1, γ2; x), where γ1 ∈ P Λ (L1), γ2 ∈ P Λ (L2), and<br />

x ∈ P Θ (H1 ⊕ H2) satisfy the index identity (193) and the action estimates<br />

ËL1(γ1) +ËL2(γ2) ≤ A,�H1⊕H2(x) ≤ A, (211)<br />

is a finite set. Let us denote by qi, i ∈ {1, . . ., m}, the points in M such that π ◦ ui(0, 0) =<br />

π ◦ ui(0, 1) = (qi, qi) for some u in the above finite set. We choose the indexing in such a way that<br />

the points qi are pair-wise distinct, and we fix a positive number δ such that<br />

Bδ(qi) ∩ Bδ(qj) = ∅, ∀ i �= j.<br />

We may assume that the positive constant δ chosen above is so small that Bδ(qi) ⊂ M is diffeomorphic<br />

toÊn . Lemma 6.7 implies the following localization result:<br />

6.8. Lemma. There exists a positive number α(A) such that for every α ∈]0, α(A)], every γ1 ∈<br />

P Λ (L1), γ2 ∈ P Λ (L2), x ∈ P Θ (H1 ⊕ H2) satisfying the index identity (193) and the action<br />

bounds (195), each solution u ∈ M K α (γ1, γ2; x) satisfies<br />

for some i ∈ {1, . . ., m}.<br />

π ◦ u([0, α] × {0}) = π ◦ u([0, α] × {1}) ⊂ B δ/2(qi) × B δ/2(qi),<br />

The chain homotopy. Since the Grassmannian of subspaces of some given dimension inÊn is<br />

connected and since the δ-ball around each qi is diffeomorphic toÊn , there exist smooth isotopies<br />

ϕij : [0, 1] ×Ê3n → Bδ(qi) 4 × Bδ(qj) 4 ⊂ M 8 , ∀i, j ∈ {1, . . .,m},<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!