Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Riemann surface ΣG is obtained from the disjoint union of two strips (Ê×[−1, 0]) ⊔ (Ê×<br />
[0, 1]) by making the identifications:<br />
�<br />
− + (s, 0 ) ∼ (s, 0 )<br />
for s ≥ 0.<br />
(s, −1) ∼ (s, 1)<br />
A holomorphic coordinate at (0, 0) is the one given by (36), and a holomorphic coordinate at<br />
(0, −1) ∼ (0, 1) is:<br />
�<br />
2 ζ − i if Imζ ≥ 0,<br />
{ζ ∈�|Reζ ≥ 0, |ζ| < 1} → ΣG, ζ ↦→<br />
ζ2 (44)<br />
+ i if Imζ ≤ 0,<br />
We obtain a Riemann surface with two boundary lines and two strip-like ends (on the left-hand<br />
side), and a cylindrical end (on the right-hand side). The global holomorphic coordinate z = s+it<br />
has two singular points, at (0, 0), and at (0, −1) ∼ (0, 1).<br />
Let H ∈ C ∞ (Ê/2�×T ∗ M) be defined by (40). Given x1 ∈ P Λ (H1), x2 ∈ P Λ (H2), y =<br />
(y1, y2) ∈ P Θ (H1 ⊕ H2), and z ∈ P Λ (H1#H2), we consider the following spaces of maps. The<br />
set ME(x1, x2; y) is the space of solutions u ∈ C ∞ (ΣE, T ∗ M) of the Floer equation<br />
∂J,H(u) = 0,<br />
satisfying the boundary conditions<br />
� πu(s, −1) = πu(s, 0 − ) = πu(s, 0 + ) = πu(s, 1),<br />
u(s, 0 − ) − u(s, −1) + u(s, 1) − u(s, 0 + ) = 0,<br />
and the asymptotic conditions<br />
∀s ≥ 0,<br />
lim<br />
s→−∞ u(s, t − 1) = x1(t), lim<br />
s→−∞ u(s, t) = x2(t), lim<br />
s→+∞ u(s, t − 1) = y1(t), lim u(s, t) = y2(t),<br />
s→+∞<br />
uniformly in t ∈ [0, 1]. The set MG(y, z) is the set of solutions u ∈ C ∞ (ΣG, T ∗ M) of the same<br />
equation, the same boundary but for s ≤ 0, and the asymptotic conditions<br />
lim<br />
s→−∞ u(s, t − 1) = y1(t), lim<br />
s→−∞ u(s, t) = y2(t), lim u(s, 2t − 1) = z(t),<br />
s→+∞<br />
uniformly in t ∈ [0, 1]. The following result is proved in section 5.10.<br />
3.9. Proposition. For a generic choice of H1 and H2, the spaces ME(x1, x2; y) and MG(y, z)<br />
- if non-empty - are manifolds of dimension<br />
dimME(x1, x2; y) = µ Λ (x1) + µ Λ (x2) − µ Θ (y) − n, dimMG(y, z) = µ Θ (y) − µ Λ (z).<br />
These manifolds carry coherent orientations.<br />
The energy identities are now<br />
� �Ê×]−1,1[<br />
|∂su(s, t)| 2 ds dt =�H1(x1) +�H2(x2) −�H1⊕H2(y), (45)<br />
for every u ∈ ME(x1, x2; y), and<br />
� �Ê×]−1,1[<br />
|∂su(s, t)| 2 ds dt =�H1⊕H2(y) −�H1#H2(z), (46)<br />
for every u ∈ MG(y, z). As usual, they imply the following compactness result (proved in section<br />
6.1).<br />
3.10. Proposition. Assume that H1, H2 satisfy (H1), (H2). Then the spaces ME(x1, x2; y) and<br />
MG(y, z) are pre-compact in C ∞ loc .<br />
34