17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Riemann surface ΣG is obtained from the disjoint union of two strips (Ê×[−1, 0]) ⊔ (Ê×<br />

[0, 1]) by making the identifications:<br />

�<br />

− + (s, 0 ) ∼ (s, 0 )<br />

for s ≥ 0.<br />

(s, −1) ∼ (s, 1)<br />

A holomorphic coordinate at (0, 0) is the one given by (36), and a holomorphic coordinate at<br />

(0, −1) ∼ (0, 1) is:<br />

�<br />

2 ζ − i if Imζ ≥ 0,<br />

{ζ ∈�|Reζ ≥ 0, |ζ| < 1} → ΣG, ζ ↦→<br />

ζ2 (44)<br />

+ i if Imζ ≤ 0,<br />

We obtain a Riemann surface with two boundary lines and two strip-like ends (on the left-hand<br />

side), and a cylindrical end (on the right-hand side). The global holomorphic coordinate z = s+it<br />

has two singular points, at (0, 0), and at (0, −1) ∼ (0, 1).<br />

Let H ∈ C ∞ (Ê/2�×T ∗ M) be defined by (40). Given x1 ∈ P Λ (H1), x2 ∈ P Λ (H2), y =<br />

(y1, y2) ∈ P Θ (H1 ⊕ H2), and z ∈ P Λ (H1#H2), we consider the following spaces of maps. The<br />

set ME(x1, x2; y) is the space of solutions u ∈ C ∞ (ΣE, T ∗ M) of the Floer equation<br />

∂J,H(u) = 0,<br />

satisfying the boundary conditions<br />

� πu(s, −1) = πu(s, 0 − ) = πu(s, 0 + ) = πu(s, 1),<br />

u(s, 0 − ) − u(s, −1) + u(s, 1) − u(s, 0 + ) = 0,<br />

and the asymptotic conditions<br />

∀s ≥ 0,<br />

lim<br />

s→−∞ u(s, t − 1) = x1(t), lim<br />

s→−∞ u(s, t) = x2(t), lim<br />

s→+∞ u(s, t − 1) = y1(t), lim u(s, t) = y2(t),<br />

s→+∞<br />

uniformly in t ∈ [0, 1]. The set MG(y, z) is the set of solutions u ∈ C ∞ (ΣG, T ∗ M) of the same<br />

equation, the same boundary but for s ≤ 0, and the asymptotic conditions<br />

lim<br />

s→−∞ u(s, t − 1) = y1(t), lim<br />

s→−∞ u(s, t) = y2(t), lim u(s, 2t − 1) = z(t),<br />

s→+∞<br />

uniformly in t ∈ [0, 1]. The following result is proved in section 5.10.<br />

3.9. Proposition. For a generic choice of H1 and H2, the spaces ME(x1, x2; y) and MG(y, z)<br />

- if non-empty - are manifolds of dimension<br />

dimME(x1, x2; y) = µ Λ (x1) + µ Λ (x2) − µ Θ (y) − n, dimMG(y, z) = µ Θ (y) − µ Λ (z).<br />

These manifolds carry coherent orientations.<br />

The energy identities are now<br />

� �Ê×]−1,1[<br />

|∂su(s, t)| 2 ds dt =�H1(x1) +�H2(x2) −�H1⊕H2(y), (45)<br />

for every u ∈ ME(x1, x2; y), and<br />

� �Ê×]−1,1[<br />

|∂su(s, t)| 2 ds dt =�H1⊕H2(y) −�H1#H2(z), (46)<br />

for every u ∈ MG(y, z). As usual, they imply the following compactness result (proved in section<br />

6.1).<br />

3.10. Proposition. Assume that H1, H2 satisfy (H1), (H2). Then the spaces ME(x1, x2; y) and<br />

MG(y, z) are pre-compact in C ∞ loc .<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!