17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 Functoriality<br />

Let (M1, g1) and (M2, g2) be complete Riemannian Hilbert manifolds, and let f1 ∈ F(M1, g1),<br />

f2 ∈ F(M2, g2) be such that −gradf1 and −gradf2 satisfy the Morse-Smale condition. Denote<br />

by φ 1 and φ 2 the corresponding negative gradient flows.<br />

Let ϕ : M1 → M2 be a smooth map. We assume that<br />

each y ∈ crit(f2) is a regular value of ϕ; (9)<br />

x ∈ crit(f1), ϕ(x) ∈ crit(f2) =⇒ m(x; f1) ≥ m(ϕ(x); f2). (10)<br />

The set of critical points of f2 is discrete, and in many cases (for instance, if ϕ is a Fredholm<br />

map) the set of regular values of ϕ is generic (i.e. a countable intersection of open dense sets, by<br />

Sard-Smale theorem [Sma65]). In such a situation, condition (9) can be achieved by arbitrary<br />

small (in several senses) perturbations of ϕ or of f2. Also condition (10) can be achieved by an<br />

arbitrary small perturbation of ϕ or of f2, simply by requiring that the image of the set of critical<br />

points of f1 by ϕ does not meet the set of critical point of f2.<br />

By (9) and (10), up to perturbing the metrics g1 and g2, we may assume that<br />

∀x ∈ crit(f1), ∀y ∈ crit(f2), ϕ| W u (x;−grad f1) is transverse to W s (y; −gradf2). (11)<br />

Indeed, by (9) and (10) one can perturb g1 in such a way that if p ∈ W u (x; −gradf1) and ϕ(p) is<br />

a critical point of f2 then rankDϕ(p)| TpW u (x) ≥ m(ϕ(p); f2). The possibility of perturbing g2 so<br />

that (11) holds is now a consequence of the following fact: if W is a finite dimensional manifold<br />

and ψ : W → M2 is a smooth map such that for every p ∈ W with ψ(p) ∈ crit(f2) there holds<br />

rankDψ(p) ≥ m(ϕ(p); f2), then the set of metrics g2 on M2 such that the map ψ is transverse<br />

to the stable manifold of every critical point of f2 is generic in the set of all metrics, with many<br />

reasonable topologies 5 .<br />

The transversality condition (11) ensures that if x ∈ crit(f1) and y ∈ crit(f2), then<br />

W(x, y) := W u (x; −gradf1) ∩ ϕ −1 (W s (y; −gradf2))<br />

is a submanifold of dimension m(x; f1) − m(y; f2). If W u (x; −gradf1) is oriented and the normal<br />

bundle of W s (y; −gradf2) in M2 is oriented, the manifold W(x, y) carries a canonical orientation.<br />

In particular, if m(x; f1) = m(y; f2), W(x, y) is a discrete set, each of whose point carries an<br />

orientation sign ±1. The transversality condition (11) and the fact that W u (x; −gradf1) has<br />

compact closure in M1 imply that the discrete set W(x, y) is also compact, so it is a finite set and<br />

we denote by nϕ(x, y) ∈�the algebraic sum of the corresponding orientation signs. We can then<br />

define the homomorphism<br />

Mkϕ : Mk(f1, g1) → Mk(f2, g2), Mkϕx = �<br />

nϕ(x, y)y,<br />

y∈critk(f2)<br />

for every x ∈ critk(f1).<br />

We claim that M∗ϕ is a chain map from the Morse complex of (f1, g1) to the Morse complex of<br />

(f2, g2), and that the corresponding homomorphism in homology coincides - via the isomorphism<br />

described in section 2.1 - with the homomorphism ϕ∗ : H∗(M1) → H∗(M2).<br />

Indeed, let us fix small open neighborhoods Ui(x), i = 1, 2, for each critical point x ∈ crit(fi),<br />

such that the sequence of open sets<br />

�<br />

= φ i ([0, +∞[×Ui(x)), k ∈Æ, i = 1, 2,<br />

U k i<br />

x∈crit(fi)<br />

m(x;fi)≤k<br />

5Here one is interested in finding perturbations of g1 and g2 which are so small that −gradf1 and −grad f2<br />

still satisfy the Morse-Smale condition and the corresponding Morse complexes are unaffected (for instance, because<br />

the perturbed flows are topologically conjugated to the original ones). This can be done by considering<br />

Banach spaces of Ck perturbations of g1 and g2 endowed with a Whitney norm, that is something like<br />

�h� = P<br />

1≤j≤k supp∈M ǫ(p)|D<br />

i jh(p)|, for a suitable positive function ǫ : Mi →]0,+∞[. We shall not specify<br />

these topologies any further, and we shall always assume that the perturbations are so small that the good properties<br />

of the original metrics are preserved.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!