Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.20. Lemma. Let (V0, V1, . . . , Vk) be a (k + 1)-uple of linear subspaces ofÊn , with Vj−1 and Vj<br />
partially orthogonal for every j = 1, . . .,k, and let W be a linear subspace ofÊn . Then<br />
c(V0, . . . , Vk; W) = c(W; V0, . . . , Vk) = − 1<br />
2<br />
k�<br />
(dimVj−1 + dimVj − 2 dimVj−1 ∩ Vj).<br />
Proof. Let us start by considering the case W =Ên . By the additivity formula (113),<br />
c(V0, . . . , Vk;Ên ) =<br />
j=1<br />
k�<br />
j=1<br />
c(Vj−1, Vj;Ên ).<br />
j<br />
Since Vj−1 and Vj are partially orthogonal,Ên has an orthogonal splittingÊn = X1 ⊕Xj 2 ⊕Xj 3 ⊕Xj 4<br />
where Vj−1 = X j<br />
1 ⊕Xj 2 and Vj = X j<br />
. By the direct sum formula (114) and by formula (116),<br />
Since<br />
c(Vj−1, Vj;Ên ) = c(X j<br />
1<br />
, Xj<br />
1<br />
; Xj<br />
1<br />
1 ⊕Xj 3<br />
) + c(Xj<br />
2<br />
, (0); Xj<br />
2<br />
) + c((0), Xj<br />
3<br />
; Xj 3 ) + c((0), (0); Xj 4 )<br />
= 0 − 1<br />
2 dimXj<br />
1<br />
2 −<br />
2 dimXj 3 + 0 = −1<br />
2 dimXj 2 ⊕ Xj 3<br />
dimX j<br />
2 ⊕ Xj 3 = dimVj−1 + dimVj − 2 dimVj−1 ∩ Vj,<br />
the formula for c(V0, . . .,Vk;Ên ) follows.<br />
Now let λ :Ê→L (n) be a continuous path of Lagrangian subspaces such that λ(s) =Ên for<br />
s ≤ −1 and λ(s) = N ∗ W for s ≥ 1. By an easy generalization of the additivity formula (113) to<br />
the case of non-constant Lagrangian boundary conditions,<br />
c(N ∗ V0; λ) + c(V0, . . .,Vk; W) = c(V0, . . . , Vk;Ên ) + c(N ∗ Vk; λ). (117)<br />
By (115), c(N ∗ V0; λ) = −µ(λ, N ∗ V0) and c(N ∗ Vk; λ) = −µ(λ, N ∗ Vk), so (117) leads to<br />
c(V0, . . .,V k ; W) = c(V0, . . . , V k ;Ên ) − (µ(λ, N ∗ Vk) − µ(λ, N ∗ V0))<br />
= c(V0, . . . , V k ;Ên ) − h(N ∗ V0, N ∗ Vk;Ên , N ∗ W),<br />
where h is the Hörmander index. By Lemma 5.2, the above Hörmander index vanishes, so we get<br />
the desired formula for c(V0, . . .,Vk; W). The formula for c(W; V0, . . . , Vk) follows by considering<br />
the change of variable v(s, t) = u(s, 1 − t).<br />
The additivity formula (113) leads to<br />
c(V0, . . . , Vk; V ′<br />
0, . . . , V ′<br />
k ′) = c(V0, . . . , Vk; V ′<br />
0) + c(Vk; V ′<br />
0, . . . , V ′<br />
k ′),<br />
and the index formula in the general case follows from (112) and the above lemma. This concludes<br />
the proof of Theorem 5.9.<br />
5.7 Half-strips with jumping conormal boundary conditions<br />
This section is devoted to the analogue of Theorem 5.9 on the half-strips<br />
Σ + := {z ∈�|0≤Im z ≤ 1, Re z ≥ 0} and Σ − := {z ∈�|0≤Im z ≤ 1, Rez ≤ 0}.<br />
In the first case, we fix the following data. Let k, k ′ ≥ 0 be integers, let<br />
0 = s0 < s1 < · · · < sk < sk+1 = +∞, 0 = s ′ 0 < s ′ 1 < · · · < s ′ k ′ < s′ k ′ +1 = +∞,<br />
be real numbers, and let W, V0, . . . , Vk, V ′<br />
0, . . .,V ′<br />
k ′ be linear subspaces ofÊn such that Vj−1 and<br />
Vj, V ′<br />
′<br />
j−1 and V j , W and V0, W and V ′<br />
0 , are partially orthogonal. We denote by V the (k +1)-uple<br />
69