17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.20. Lemma. Let (V0, V1, . . . , Vk) be a (k + 1)-uple of linear subspaces ofÊn , with Vj−1 and Vj<br />

partially orthogonal for every j = 1, . . .,k, and let W be a linear subspace ofÊn . Then<br />

c(V0, . . . , Vk; W) = c(W; V0, . . . , Vk) = − 1<br />

2<br />

k�<br />

(dimVj−1 + dimVj − 2 dimVj−1 ∩ Vj).<br />

Proof. Let us start by considering the case W =Ên . By the additivity formula (113),<br />

c(V0, . . . , Vk;Ên ) =<br />

j=1<br />

k�<br />

j=1<br />

c(Vj−1, Vj;Ên ).<br />

j<br />

Since Vj−1 and Vj are partially orthogonal,Ên has an orthogonal splittingÊn = X1 ⊕Xj 2 ⊕Xj 3 ⊕Xj 4<br />

where Vj−1 = X j<br />

1 ⊕Xj 2 and Vj = X j<br />

. By the direct sum formula (114) and by formula (116),<br />

Since<br />

c(Vj−1, Vj;Ên ) = c(X j<br />

1<br />

, Xj<br />

1<br />

; Xj<br />

1<br />

1 ⊕Xj 3<br />

) + c(Xj<br />

2<br />

, (0); Xj<br />

2<br />

) + c((0), Xj<br />

3<br />

; Xj 3 ) + c((0), (0); Xj 4 )<br />

= 0 − 1<br />

2 dimXj<br />

1<br />

2 −<br />

2 dimXj 3 + 0 = −1<br />

2 dimXj 2 ⊕ Xj 3<br />

dimX j<br />

2 ⊕ Xj 3 = dimVj−1 + dimVj − 2 dimVj−1 ∩ Vj,<br />

the formula for c(V0, . . .,Vk;Ên ) follows.<br />

Now let λ :Ê→L (n) be a continuous path of Lagrangian subspaces such that λ(s) =Ên for<br />

s ≤ −1 and λ(s) = N ∗ W for s ≥ 1. By an easy generalization of the additivity formula (113) to<br />

the case of non-constant Lagrangian boundary conditions,<br />

c(N ∗ V0; λ) + c(V0, . . .,Vk; W) = c(V0, . . . , Vk;Ên ) + c(N ∗ Vk; λ). (117)<br />

By (115), c(N ∗ V0; λ) = −µ(λ, N ∗ V0) and c(N ∗ Vk; λ) = −µ(λ, N ∗ Vk), so (117) leads to<br />

c(V0, . . .,V k ; W) = c(V0, . . . , V k ;Ên ) − (µ(λ, N ∗ Vk) − µ(λ, N ∗ V0))<br />

= c(V0, . . . , V k ;Ên ) − h(N ∗ V0, N ∗ Vk;Ên , N ∗ W),<br />

where h is the Hörmander index. By Lemma 5.2, the above Hörmander index vanishes, so we get<br />

the desired formula for c(V0, . . .,Vk; W). The formula for c(W; V0, . . . , Vk) follows by considering<br />

the change of variable v(s, t) = u(s, 1 − t).<br />

The additivity formula (113) leads to<br />

c(V0, . . . , Vk; V ′<br />

0, . . . , V ′<br />

k ′) = c(V0, . . . , Vk; V ′<br />

0) + c(Vk; V ′<br />

0, . . . , V ′<br />

k ′),<br />

and the index formula in the general case follows from (112) and the above lemma. This concludes<br />

the proof of Theorem 5.9.<br />

5.7 Half-strips with jumping conormal boundary conditions<br />

This section is devoted to the analogue of Theorem 5.9 on the half-strips<br />

Σ + := {z ∈�|0≤Im z ≤ 1, Re z ≥ 0} and Σ − := {z ∈�|0≤Im z ≤ 1, Rez ≤ 0}.<br />

In the first case, we fix the following data. Let k, k ′ ≥ 0 be integers, let<br />

0 = s0 < s1 < · · · < sk < sk+1 = +∞, 0 = s ′ 0 < s ′ 1 < · · · < s ′ k ′ < s′ k ′ +1 = +∞,<br />

be real numbers, and let W, V0, . . . , Vk, V ′<br />

0, . . .,V ′<br />

k ′ be linear subspaces ofÊn such that Vj−1 and<br />

Vj, V ′<br />

′<br />

j−1 and V j , W and V0, W and V ′<br />

0 , are partially orthogonal. We denote by V the (k +1)-uple<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!