17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

By using the change of variable v = Uu, we find<br />

c(W; V0; V ′<br />

0) = c((0); W0; W ′ 0), (119)<br />

and we are reduced to compute the latter quantity. By an easy homotopy argument, using the fact<br />

that the Fredholm index is locally constant in the operator norm topology, we can assume that W0<br />

and W ′ 0 are partially orthogonal. ThenÊn has an orthogonal splittingÊn = X1 ⊕ X2 ⊕ X3 ⊕ X4,<br />

where<br />

from which<br />

W0 = X1 ⊕ X2, W ′ 0 = X1 ⊕ X3,<br />

N ∗ W0 = X1 ⊕ X2 ⊕ iX3 ⊕ iX4, N ∗ W ′ 0 = X1 ⊕ iX2 ⊕ X3 ⊕ iX4.<br />

Then the operator ∂αI decomposes as the direct sum of four operators, whose index is computed<br />

in cases (i), (ii), and (iii) above. Indeed,<br />

Since<br />

we find<br />

c((0); W0; W ′ 1<br />

0 ) =<br />

2 dim X4 − 1<br />

dim X1<br />

2<br />

= 1<br />

2 codim(W0 + W ′ 1<br />

0 ) −<br />

2 dimW0 ∩ W ′ 1<br />

0 =<br />

2 (n − dimW0 − dim W ′ 0 ).<br />

dim W0 = dim(V0 + W) − dim V0 ∩ W = dimV0 + dimW − 2 dimW0 ∩ W,<br />

dimW ′ ′<br />

′<br />

′<br />

0 = dim(V 0 + W) − dimV 0 ∩ W = dimV 0 + dim W − 2 dimW ′ 0 ∩ W,<br />

c((0); W0; W ′ n 1<br />

0 ) = −<br />

2<br />

2 (dim V0 + dimW − 2 dimW0 ∩ W) − 1<br />

2<br />

Together with (119), this proves formula (118).<br />

′<br />

(dimV 0 + dimW − 2 dimW′ 0 ∩ W).<br />

We conclude this section by considering the case of the left half-strip Σ− . Let k, k ′ ≥ 0,<br />

V = (V0, . . . , Vk), and V ′ = (V ′ ′<br />

0 , . . . , V ′) be as above. Let<br />

k<br />

−∞ = sk+1 < sk < · · · < s1 < s0 = 0, −∞ = s ′ k ′ +1 < s ′ k ′ < · · · < s′ 1 < s ′ 0 = 0,<br />

be real numbers, and set S = {s1, . . . , sk, s ′ 1 + i, . . .,s ′ k ′ + i}.<br />

Let X 1,p<br />

S ,W,V ,V ′(Σ− ,�n ) be the completion of the space of maps u ∈ C ∞ S ,c (Σ − ,�n ) satisfying<br />

the boundary conditions<br />

u(it) ∈ N ∗ W ∀t ∈ [0, 1], u(s) ∈ N ∗ Vj ∀s ∈ [sj+1, sj], u(s + i) ∈ N ∗ V ′<br />

j ∀s ∈ [s ′ j+1, s ′ j],<br />

with respect to the norm �u� X 1,p (Σ − ).<br />

Let A ∈ C 0 ([−∞, 0]×[0, 1], L(Ê2n ,Ê2n )) be such that A(−∞, t) is symmetric for every t ∈ [0, 1],<br />

and denote by Φ − : [0, 1] → Sp(2n) the solutions of the linear Hamiltonian system<br />

Then we have:<br />

d<br />

dt Φ− (t) = iA(−∞, t)Φ − (t), Φ − (0) = I.<br />

5.22. Theorem. Assume that Φ − (1)N ∗ Vk ∩ N ∗ V ′<br />

k ′ = (0). Then theÊ-linear operator<br />

∂A : X 1,p<br />

S ,W,V ,V ′(Σ − ,�n ) → X p<br />

S (Σ− ,�n ), ∂Au = ∂u + Au, (120)<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!