17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proof. By Proposition 5.14 the operator ∂α is semi-Fredholm, so it is enough to prove that its<br />

kernel and co-kernel are both (0).<br />

Let u ∈ X 1,p (Σ) be an element of the kernel of ∂α. By Proposition 5.12, u(z) has exponential<br />

decay for |Re z| → +∞ together with all its derivatives. By Lemma 5.15, u is smooth on Σ \ {0},<br />

it is continuous at 0, and Du(z) = O(|z| −1/2 ) for z → 0. Then the function w := u 2 belongs to<br />

W 1,q (Σ,�) for every q < 4. Moreover, w is real on the boundary of Σ, and it satisfies the equation<br />

∂w + 2αw = 0.<br />

Since 0 < 2α < π, e 2αiÊ∩Ê=(0), so the assumptions of Theorem 5.11 (ii) are satisfied, and the<br />

operator<br />

∂2α : W 1,q<br />

Ê,Ê(Σ,�) → L q (Σ,�)<br />

is an isomorphism. Therefore w = 0, hence u = 0, proving that the operator ∂α has vanishing<br />

kernel.<br />

Let v ∈ X q (Σ), 1/p + 1/q = 1, be an element of the cokernel of ∂α. By Lemma 5.16, v is<br />

smooth on Σ \ {0}, v(s) ∈ iÊfor s < 0, v(s) ∈Êfor s > 0, v solves ∂v − αv = 0, and the function<br />

w(ζ) := 2ζv(ζ 2 ) (104)<br />

is smooth in Cl(À+ ) ∩�1 and real on the boundary ofÀ+ . In particular, v(z) = O(|z| −1/2 ) and<br />

Dv(z) = O(|z| −3/2 ) for z → 0. Furthermore, by Proposition 5.12, v and Dv decay exponentially<br />

for |Re z| → +∞. More precisely, since the spectrum of the operator Lα on L 2 (]0, 1[,�),<br />

domLα = W 1,2<br />

Ê,Ê(]0, 1[,�) = � u ∈ W 1,2 (]0, 1[,�) | u(0), u(1) ∈Ê�<br />

, Lα = i d<br />

+ α,<br />

dt<br />

is α + π�, we have min σ(Lα) ∩ [0, +∞) = α, hence<br />

|v(z)| ≤ ce −α|Re z| , for |Re z| ≥ 1. (105)<br />

If w(0) = 0, the function v vanishes at 0, and Dv(z) = O(|z| −1 ) for z → 0, so v2 belongs to<br />

W 1,q<br />

Ê,Ê(Σ,�) for any q < 2, it solves ∂v2 −2αv2 = 0, and as before we deduce that v = 0. Therefore,<br />

we can assume that the real number w(0) is not zero.<br />

Consider the function<br />

Since ∂v = αv,<br />

f : Σ \ {0} →�, f(z) := e −αz/2 v(z).<br />

∂f(z) = −αe −αz/2 v(z) + e −αz/2 ∂v(z) = e −αz/2 (−αv(z) + αv(z)) = 0,<br />

so f is holomorphic on the interior of Σ. Moreover, f is smooth on Σ \ {0}, and<br />

f(s) = e −αs/2 v(s) ∈ iÊfor s < 0, f(s) = e −αs/2 v(s) ∈Êfor s > 0, (106)<br />

f(s + i) = e −αs/2 v(s + i)e αi/2 ∈ e αi/2Êfor every s ∈Ê. (107)<br />

Denote by √ z the determination of the square root on�\Ê− such that √ z is real and positive<br />

for z real and positive, so that √ z = √ z. By (104),<br />

Finally, by (105),<br />

−αz/2 1<br />

f(z) = −e √ w(<br />

z √ z) = w(0)<br />

√ + o(|z|<br />

z −1/2 ) for z → 0. (108)<br />

lim f(z) = 0. (109)<br />

|Re z|→+∞<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!