17.01.2013 Views

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

PDF (1016 kB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The following compactness statement follows from the general discussion of section 6.1.<br />

3.17. Proposition. The space MI! (x, y) is pre-compact in C∞ loc (ΣI! , T ∗ M).<br />

When µ Ω (y) = µ Λ (x) − n, the space MI! (x, y) consists of finitely many oriented points. The<br />

algebraic sum of these orientations is denoted by nI! (x, y), and defines the homomorphism<br />

I! : F Λ k (H, J) → F Ω k−n(H, J), x ↦→ �<br />

nI! (x, y)y.<br />

A standard gluing argument shows that I! is a chain map.<br />

y∈P Ω (H)<br />

µ Ω (y)=k−n<br />

4 Isomorphisms between Morse and Floer complexes<br />

4.1 The chain complex isomorphisms<br />

Let L ∈ C∞ ([0, 1] × T ∗M) or L ∈ C∞ (Ì×T ∗M) be a Lagrangian satisfying (L1) and (L2). Let<br />

H be the Fenchel transform of L, that is<br />

�<br />

�<br />

H(t, q, p) := max p(v) − L(t, q, v) .<br />

v∈TqM<br />

It is easy to see that H satisfies (H1) and (H2). If v(t, q, p) ∈ TqM is the (unique) vector where<br />

the above maximum is achieved, the map<br />

[0, 1] × T ∗ M → [0, 1] × TM, (t, q, p) ↦→ (t, q, v(t, q, p)),<br />

is a diffeomorphism, called the Legendre transform associated to the Lagrangian L. The Legendre<br />

transform induces a one-to-one correspondence x ↦→ π ◦ x between the orbits of the Hamiltonian<br />

vector field XH and the solutions of the second order Lagrangian equation given by L. When H<br />

is the Fenchel transform of L, we have the fundamental inequality between the Hamiltonian and<br />

the Lagrangian action functionals:<br />

�H(x) ≤ËL(π ◦ x), ∀x : [0, 1] → T ∗ M, (49)<br />

with the equality holding if and only if x is related to (π ◦ x, (π ◦ x) ′ ) by the Legendre transform.<br />

In particular, the equality holds if x is an orbit of the Hamiltonian vector field XH. In this section<br />

we recall the definition of the isomorphisms<br />

Φ Ω L : Mk(ËΩ L, g Ω ) → F Ω k (H, J), Φ Λ L : Mk(ËΛ L, g Λ ) → F Λ k (H, J),<br />

between the Morse complex of the Lagrangian action functional and the Floer complex of the<br />

corresponding Hamiltonian system. See [AS06b] for detailed proofs.<br />

We assume that L satisfies (L0) Ω , resp. (L0) Λ , equivalently that H satisfies (H0) Ω , resp. (H0) Λ .<br />

Consider a Riemannian metric g Ω , resp. g Λ , on Ω 1 (M, q0), resp. Λ 1 (M), such that the Lagrangian<br />

action functionalËL satisfies the Palais-Smale and the Morse-Smale conditions. Given γ ∈ P Ω (L)<br />

and x ∈ P Ω (H), we denote by M Ω Φ (γ, x) the space of maps u ∈ C∞ ([0, +∞[×[0, 1], T ∗ M) which<br />

solve the Floer equation<br />

and satisfy the boundary conditions<br />

∂J,H(u) = 0, (50)<br />

u(s, 0) ∈ T ∗ q0M, u(s, 1) ∈ T ∗ M, ∀s ≥ 0,<br />

q0<br />

π ◦ u(0, ·) ∈ W u (γ, −gradËΩ<br />

L ),<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!