19.01.2013 Views

Tidal Current Energy

Tidal Current Energy

Tidal Current Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Biomass<br />

167<br />

in the computation of bioenergy and biofuel production costs. Large-scale international<br />

transportation from bioenergy-producing regions to bioenergy-using<br />

regions will need to be conducted via a broad variety of chains comprising different<br />

biomass pretreatment and conversion operations, and different transportation<br />

avenues for refined biomass [24].<br />

To put biofuels and bioenergy into perspective, with respect to conventional<br />

fossil fuels, Table 9.5 provides the energy densities for some fossil fuels compared<br />

with a typical biomass source, namely wood. As can be seen, in terms of transport<br />

and storage, biomass is at a considerable disadvantage compared with fossil fuels<br />

[26,35]. A comparison of the energy yield on a cost basis with conventional fuel<br />

costs is presented in Table 9.6. The large cost ranges are due to the variation in the<br />

performances of bioenergy systems. For the purpose of this comparison, fossilfuel<br />

processes are assumed to be constant. It can be seen that, in the long term, the<br />

most economic bioenergy system is likely to be the one based on the production of<br />

electricity from wood. This surpasses electricity production from traditional fossil<br />

fuels. On the other hand, on an economic basis alone, bioenergy replacements for<br />

petrol or diesel do not presently appear to compete with fossil-derived fuels [26].<br />

The use of biomass for the production of bioenergy leads to large carbon dioxide<br />

reductions per unit of energy produced, as compared with fossil fuels. Biomass can<br />

Table 9.5. Biomass and fossil-fuel energy densities.<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> source <strong>Energy</strong> density/(GJ�t �1 )<br />

Liquefied natural gas 56<br />

Mineral oil 42<br />

Coal 28<br />

Biomass (wood – 50% moisture) 8<br />

(Source: Ref. [26])<br />

Table 9.6. Cost ratios of bioenergy systems compared with conventional fuel costs.<br />

Bioenergy system Biofuel<br />

production cost<br />

(1991 crop prices)<br />

Ethanol production from<br />

wheat (replacing petrol)<br />

Ethanol production from<br />

beet (replacing petrol)<br />

RME production (replacing<br />

diesel)<br />

Methanol production from<br />

wood (replacing petrol)<br />

Electricity production from<br />

wood (replacing grid<br />

electricity)<br />

(Source: Ref. [35])<br />

Estimated future<br />

biofuel production<br />

(based on world<br />

market/lowest price)<br />

<strong>Current</strong><br />

context /<br />

(GJ�ha�1�a�1 Future<br />

technology/<br />

) (GJ�ha�1�a�1 )<br />

4.7–5.9 2.9–3.5 2 36<br />

5.0–5.7 4.2–4.5 30 139<br />

5.5–7.8 2.8–3.3 17 41<br />

n/a 1.9–2.2 110 165<br />

1.3–1.9 0.8–1.1 110 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!