19.01.2013 Views

Tidal Current Energy

Tidal Current Energy

Tidal Current Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor<br />

251<br />

decisions or on active electrical and mechanical systems starting up or otherwise<br />

operating correctly.<br />

There are, of course, many other facets to radiation and nuclear safety that<br />

have had to be addressed. For example, are radioactive effluents during normal<br />

operation significant? What about routine radiation exposure of operating<br />

staff? If, for any reason, a major pipe into the reactor pressure vessel breaks, can<br />

sufficient air subsequently enter the vessel to cause the hot graphite to burn? If<br />

there were such a break, would the building withstand the pressure surge due<br />

to escaping helium? How much radioactive material would then be sent into the<br />

atmosphere? Will the reinforced concrete building withstand a large earthquake<br />

or a major aircraft crash?<br />

Work is underway to satisfy the South African National Nuclear Regulator<br />

and its international nuclear safety consultants in all such respects. The PBMR<br />

designers are confident that in none of these or any other credible events will<br />

protective actions be necessary to safeguard the public beyond 400 m from the<br />

reactor. More detailed information concerning HTR safety can be obtained from<br />

Ref. [7] .<br />

Finally, there is the important and emotive issue of the ultimate disposal of<br />

spent fuel spheres. It is increasingly acknowledged that it is unacceptably wasteful<br />

to dispose of spent fuel from current light water reactors without ‘ reprocessing ’ it<br />

to recover useful plutonium and residual uranium. Spent PBMR fuel, however,<br />

will contain so little residual fissile or fertile material that reprocessing appears<br />

unlikely unless thorium is incorporated into the fuel to breed uranium-233. This<br />

was an objective in the German THTR design. The spent fuel will therefore probably<br />

be disposed of 50 or more years after decommissioning, suitably immobilized<br />

along with other high-level radioactive waste, in deep geological repositories.<br />

The design of the fuel spheres will make this a more straightforward task for<br />

PBMR fuel than for other spent fuel. As discussed, the spheres consist of minute<br />

uranium dioxide kernels coated with graphite, embedded in graphite spheres<br />

and surrounded by a 5-mm-thick shell of uranium-free graphite. Graphite is a<br />

more durable form of carbon than is coal and coal deposits remain undisturbed<br />

in the earth’s crust for many millions of years. So therefore should spent PBMR<br />

fuel spheres, long after vessels that contain them have corroded away.<br />

The total volume of spent spheres is, however, great relative to that of compacted<br />

spent fuel from light water reactors. The cost, in particular, of transporting<br />

spent fuel spheres to a repository will therefore also be relatively great.<br />

Notwithstanding the durability underground of used spheres, it may therefore<br />

be deemed appropriate to separate the coated particles from the graphite matrix.<br />

Ways of doing so and even of recycling the graphite are being researched. If<br />

such a process proves technically and economically feasible, the waste to be disposed<br />

of will be reduced to around 5 % of the volume of the spheres themselves.<br />

Because of the ceramic shell surrounding each uranium kernel, vitrified or otherwise<br />

suitably packaged waste in this form will also have very high resistance<br />

to possible groundwater corrosion. Further information concerning radioactive<br />

waste can be obtained from Ref. [8] .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!