19.01.2013 Views

Tidal Current Energy

Tidal Current Energy

Tidal Current Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

324 D. Tondeur and F. Teng<br />

3.3 .<br />

Table 18.5 . CO 2 EOR projects worldwide.<br />

Country Total projects Ongoing projects<br />

USA<br />

85 67<br />

Canada 8<br />

2<br />

Hungary 3<br />

0<br />

Turkey 2<br />

1<br />

Trinidad 5<br />

5<br />

Brazil<br />

1<br />

1<br />

China<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Total 105 76<br />

( Source : IEA [20] )<br />

CO 2 enhanced oil and gas recovery (CO 2 EOR and CO 2 EGR)<br />

Oil and gas fields are depleted because the pressure within the hydrocarbon formation<br />

drops when the oil or gas is produced until the pressure is no longer<br />

sufficient to drive fluid towards the wellbore. The injection of CO 2 into these<br />

depleted formations can repressurize the formation. When CO 2 is injected<br />

into an oil field, it also can mix with oil, reduce its viscosity and help the oil<br />

flow more easily to the production well. The combination of these effects will<br />

increase oil and gas production; this is the so-called CO 2 enhanced oil recovery<br />

(CO 2 EOR) or CO 2 enhanced gas recovery (CO 2 EGR). In EOR or EGR, not all the<br />

injected CO 2 remains in the oil and gas fields; part of the CO 2 will be extracted<br />

from the produced oil and recycled, while part of it will be ‘ fixed ’ in the oil and<br />

gas reservoir. For CO 2 EOR, up to half of the CO 2 will be stored in the reservoir<br />

after production, while the rest will be separated and reused.<br />

CO 2 EOR is a commercially proven technology which is already widely used<br />

in the USA and other countries ( Table 18.5 ).<br />

Worldwide, the potential for CO 2 EOR is limited. One reason is that CO 2 EOR is<br />

restricted to oil fields with an API gravity between 27 and 48, equivalent to a density<br />

between 788 and 893 kg�m � 3 , which makes this method unsuitable for heavy<br />

oil [21] . Another reason is the uneven distribution of oil fields around the world,<br />

and suitable point sources for CO 2 capture may be far away from the oil fields.<br />

Moreover, CO 2 EOR has to compete with other EOR technologies like water flooding<br />

or polymer flooding. CO 2 EOR can substantially improve the oil production<br />

(8–15% of the total quantity of original oil in place, based on US experience).<br />

The Weyburn CO 2 EOR project is located in Williston Basin, Saskatchewan,<br />

Canada. The aim of this project is to assess the technical and economic feasibility<br />

of CO 2 storage in oil reservoirs. The field covers an area of 180 km 2 with<br />

an average crude oil production of 2900 m 3� d � 1 . The injection of CO 2 began in<br />

2000 with a rate of 5000 t� d � 1 (about 2.69 � 10 6 m 3� d � 1 ). The CO 2 comes from<br />

a synthetic gas facility located in North Dakota, USA, through a 325-km pipeline.<br />

The Weyburn CO 2 EOR project is designed to accumulate CO 2 for about

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!