19.01.2013 Views

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10. Electroweak model and constraints on new physics 173<br />

For momenta small compared to MW , this term gives rise to the effective<br />

four-fermion interaction with the Fermi constant given (at tree level, i.e.,<br />

lowest order in perturbation theory) by GF / √ 2=g2 /8M 2 W . CP violation<br />

is incorporated in the SM by a single observable phase in Vij. The third<br />

term in LF describes electromagnetic interactions (QED), and the last is<br />

the weak neutral-current interaction.<br />

In Eq. (10.1), mi is the mass of the ith fermion ψi. In the presence<br />

of right-handed neutrinos, Eq. (10.1) gives rise also to Dirac neutrino<br />

masses. The possibility of Majorana masses is discussed in the Section on<br />

“Neutrino Mass, Mixing, and Flavor Change”.<br />

H is the physical neutral Higgs scalar which is the only remaining part<br />

of φ after spontaneous symmetry breaking. The Yukawa coupling of H<br />

to ψi, which is flavor diagonal in the minimal model, is gmi/2MW .In<br />

non-minimal models there are additional charged and neutral scalar Higgs<br />

particles [10].<br />

10.2. Renormalization and radiative corrections<br />

The SM has three parameters (not counting the Higgs boson mass,<br />

MH, and the fermion masses and mixings). A particularly useful set<br />

contains the Z-boson mass, MZ =91.1876 ± 0.0021 GeV, which has<br />

been determined from the Z lineshape scan at LEP 1; the fine structure<br />

constant, α =1/137.035999084(51), which is currently best determined<br />

from the e ± anomalous magnetic moment; and the Fermi constant, GF =<br />

1.166364(5) × 10−5 GeV−2 , which is derived from the muon lifetime<br />

formula. See the full Review for more details.<br />

With these inputs, sin2 θW and the W boson mass, MW , can be<br />

calculated when values for mt and MH are given; conversely (as is done at<br />

present), MH can be constrained by sin2 θW and MW . The value of sin2 θW is extracted from Z pole observables and neutral-current processes [11,60],<br />

and depends on the renormalization prescription. There are a number of<br />

popular schemes [61–68] leading to values which differ by small factors<br />

depending on mt and MH, including the MS definition �s 2 Z and the on-shell<br />

definition s2 W ≡ 1 − M 2 W /M 2 Z .<br />

Experiments are at such level of precision that complete O(α) radiative<br />

corrections must be applied. These are discussed in the full edition of this<br />

Review. A variety of related cross-section and asymmetry formulae are<br />

also discussed there.<br />

10.3.1. W and Z decays :<br />

The partial decay width for gauge bosons to decay into massless<br />

fermions f1f 2 (the numerical values include the small electroweak<br />

radiative corrections and final state mass effects) is<br />

Γ(W + → e + νe) = G F M 3 W<br />

6 √ 2π<br />

Γ(W + → uidj) = CG F M 3 W<br />

6 √ 2π<br />

Γ(Z → ψiψ i )= CG F M 3 Z<br />

6 √ 2π<br />

≈ 226.31 ± 0.07 MeV , (10.33a)<br />

�<br />

|Vij| 2 ≈ 706.18 ± 0.22 MeV |Vij| 2 (10.33b)<br />

g i2<br />

V<br />

�<br />

+ gi2 A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!