19.01.2013 Views

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

194 13. Neutrino mixing<br />

(L(¯νj) =− 1). The neutrinos νj can be Majorana particles if no lepton<br />

charge is conserved (see, e.g., Ref. 29). A massive Majorana particle χj is<br />

identical with its antiparticle ¯χj: χj ≡ ¯χj. On the basis of the existing<br />

neutrino data it is impossible to determine whether the massive neutrinos<br />

are Dirac or Majorana fermions.<br />

In the case of n neutrino flavours and n massive neutrinos, the n × n<br />

unitary neutrino mixing matrix U can be parametrised by n(n − 1)/2<br />

Euler angles and n(n +1)/2phases. If the massive neutrinos νj are Dirac<br />

particles, only (n − 1)(n − 2)/2 phases are physical and can be responsible<br />

for CP violation in the lepton sector. In this respect the neutrino mixing<br />

with Dirac massive neutrinos is similar to the quark mixing. For n =3<br />

there is one CP violating phase in U, “the Dirac CP violating phase.” CP<br />

invariance holds if U is real, U ∗ = U.<br />

If, however, the massive neutrinos are Majorana fermions, νj ≡ χj, the<br />

neutrino mixing matrix U contains n(n − 1)/2 CP violation phases [30,31],<br />

i.e., by(n−1) phases more than in the Dirac neutrino case: in contrast to<br />

Dirac fields, the massive Majorana neutrino fields cannot “absorb” phases.<br />

In this case U can be cast in the form [30]<br />

U = VP (13.2)<br />

where the matrix V contains the (n − 1)(n − 2)/2 Dirac CP violation<br />

phases, while P is a diagonal matrix with the additional (n − 1) Majorana<br />

CP violation phases α21, α31,..., αn1,<br />

�<br />

P = diag 1,e i α21 2 ,e i α31 2 , ..., e i α �<br />

n1<br />

2 . (13.3)<br />

The Majorana phases will conserve CP if [32] αj1 = πqj, qj =0, 1, 2,<br />

j =2, 3, ..., n. Inthiscaseexp[i(αj1−αk1)] = ±1 is the relative CP-parity<br />

of Majorana neutrinos χj and χk. The condition of CP invariance of the<br />

leptonic CC weak interaction reads [29]:<br />

U ∗ lj = Ulj ρj , ρj = − iηCP(χj) =±1 , (13.4)<br />

where ηCP(χj) is the CP parity of the Majorana neutrino χj [32].<br />

In the case of n = 3 there are 3 CP violation phases - one Dirac and<br />

two Majorana. Even in the mixing involving only 2 massive Majorana<br />

neutrinos there is one physical CP violation Majorana phase.<br />

II. Neutrino oscillations in vacuum. Neutrino oscillations are a<br />

quantum mechanical consequence of the existence of nonzero neutrino<br />

masses and neutrino (lepton) mixing, Eq. (13.1), and of the relatively<br />

small splitting between the neutrino masses.<br />

Suppose the flavour neutrino νl is produced in a CC weak interaction<br />

process and is observed by a neutrino detector capable of detecting also<br />

neutrinos νl ′, l ′ �= l. If lepton mixing, Eq. (13.1), takes place and the<br />

masses mj of all neutrinos νj are sufficiently small, the state of the<br />

neutrino νl, |νl〉, will be a coherent superposition of the states |νj〉 of<br />

neutrinos νj:<br />

|νl〉 = �<br />

U ∗ lj |νj; ˜pj〉, l = e, μ, τ , (13.5)<br />

j<br />

˜pj being the 4-momentum of νj. For the state vector of the flavour<br />

antineutrino ¯ν l, produced in a weak interaction process, we get:<br />

|¯ν l〉 = �<br />

Ulj |¯νj; ˜pj〉 ,l = e, μ, τ . (13.7)<br />

j<br />

Note the presence of U in Eq. (13.5) and U ∗ in Eq. (13.7).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!