19.01.2013 Views

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

Particle Physics Booklet - Particle Data Group - Lawrence Berkeley ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10. Electroweak model and constraints on new physics 179<br />

Table 10.5: Values of �s 2 Z , s2 W , αs, andM H [in GeV] for various<br />

(combinations of) observables. Unless indicated otherwise, the top<br />

quark mass, mt = 170.9±1.9 GeV, is used as an additional constraint<br />

in the fits. The (†) symbol indicates a fixed parameter.<br />

<strong>Data</strong> �s 2 Z s 2 W αs(M Z) M H<br />

All data 0.23116(13) 0.22292(28) 0.1183(15) 90 +27<br />

−22<br />

All indirect (no mt) 0.23118(14) 0.22283(34) 0.1183(16) 112 +110<br />

− 52<br />

Z pole (no mt) 0.23121(17) 0.22311(59) 0.1198(28) 90 +114<br />

− 44<br />

LEP 1 (no mt) 0.23152(21) 0.22376(67) 0.1213(30) 170 +234<br />

− 93<br />

SLD + MZ 0.23067(29) 0.22201(54) 0.1183 (†) 33 +27<br />

−17<br />

A (b,c)<br />

FB + MZ 0.23193(28) 0.22484(76) 0.1183 (†) 389 +264<br />

−158<br />

MW + MZ 0.23100(23) 0.22262(48) 0.1183 (†) 67 +38<br />

−28<br />

MZ 0.23128(6) 0.22321(17) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

QW (APV) 0.2314(14) 0.2233(14) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

QW (e) 0.2332(15) 0.2251(15) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

νμ-N DIS (isoscalar) 0.2335(18) 0.2254(18) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

Elastic νμ(νμ)-e 0.2311(77) 0.2230(77) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

e-D DIS (SLAC) 0.222(18) 0.213(19) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

Elastic νμ(νμ)-p 0.211(33) 0.203(33) 0.1183 (†) 117 (†)<br />

αs(MZ)=0.1198 ± 0.0028, is very sensitive to such types of new physics<br />

as non-universal vertex corrections. In contrast, the value derived from<br />

τ decays, αs(MZ)=0.1174 +0.0018<br />

−0.0016 , is theory dominated but less sensitive<br />

to new physics. The two values are in remarkable agreement with each<br />

other. They are also in agreement with other recent values, such as<br />

from jet-event shapes at LEP [215] (0.1202 ± 0.0050) the average<br />

from HERA [216] (0.1198 ± 0.0032), and the most recent unquenched<br />

lattice calculation [217] (0.1183 ± 0.0008). For more details and other<br />

determinations, see our Section 9 on “Quantum Chromodynamics” in this<br />

Review.<br />

Using α(MZ)and�s2 Z as inputs, one can predict αs(MZ)assuming grand unification. One predicts [218] αs(MZ)=0.130 ± 0.001 ± 0.01 for<br />

the simplest theories based on the minimal supersymmetric extension<br />

of the SM, where the first (second) uncertainty is from the inputs<br />

(thresholds). This is slightly larger, but consistent with the experimental<br />

αs(MZ) =0.1183 ± 0.0015 from the Z lineshape and the τ lifetime, as<br />

well as with other determinations. Non-supersymmetric unified theories<br />

predict the low value αs(MZ)=0.073 ± 0.001 ± 0.001. See also the note<br />

on “Supersymmetry” in the Searches <strong>Particle</strong> Listings.<br />

The data indicate a preference for a small Higgs mass. There is<br />

a strong correlation between the quadratic mt and logarithmic MH terms in �ρ in all of the indirect data except for the Z → bb vertex.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!