AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A2.1 Summary of Supporting Body of Knowledge<br />
A2.1.1 Long-Term MSW Leachate Generation<br />
Geosyntec Consultants<br />
Leachate is produced when the field moisture-holding capacity of the waste contained in the<br />
landfill is exceeded. This occurs when the waste moisture deficit (the difference between the<br />
waste moisture content at placement and field capacity) is exceeded. Leachate generation rates<br />
are most greatly affected by the type and condition of the in-place engineered cover system at<br />
the landfill. Four other factors affecting leachate production at a landfill (Rees, 1980) include: (i)<br />
the water content of the waste when placed; (ii) the volume of leachate recirculation or other<br />
liquids addition; (iii) the volume of liquids or sludges co-disposed with the waste; and (iv) waste<br />
compaction and density.<br />
From the above, it is clear that good landfill cover design is the most important limiting factor<br />
controlling the amount of leachate generated at a site. For example, in a broad study cited by<br />
Bonaparte, et al (2002a) that included 11 MSW and 26 hazardous waste landfill cells that had<br />
a leachate collection system and cover systems including a geomembrane layer, it was found that<br />
the rate of leachate generation decreased by approximately three orders of magnitude less than<br />
ten years after closure. The above finding, coupled with the expected longevity of Subtitle D<br />
liner systems (Othman, et al, 2002) and demonstrated improvement in leachate quality over time<br />
(as liner performance gradually declines), therefore means that closed landfills relying on Subtitle<br />
D compliant cover and liner systems to limit generation and emission of leachate can expect to<br />
continue to be protective of HHE over the very long term (Pivato & Morris, 2005).<br />
It should also be noted that new approaches to landfill operations and management have been<br />
promulgated to promote long-term threat reduction through enhanced waste degradation (i.e.,<br />
enhanced organic stability) rather than reduced infiltration and leachate generation in the PCC<br />
period (see Wisconsin NR 514.07.9). This regulation uses methane and carbon dioxide<br />
generation rates as a surrogate for waste decomposition (i.e., there is an expected direct<br />
correlation between improving leachate quality and reduction in methane/carbon dioxide<br />
generation rates with time, which is clearly a function of waste decay as illustrated in Figure A-1).<br />
However, in most cases achieving the required waste degradation cannot realistically be attained<br />
without consistently adding liquid to the refuse during operations and the post-closure period.<br />
Therefore, implementing a waste degradation approach to managing the long-term impact<br />
potential will require proactive landfill operations (e.g., leachate recirculation, bioreactor<br />
operations, and/or alternative all-soil covers) to optimize the moisture content necessary for<br />
enhanced waste degradation (ITRC, 2003 and 2006a). This performance-based PCC approach<br />
will require maintaining optimum moisture contents in the waste mass while effectively managing<br />
leachate and LFG generation until the landfill becomes stable.<br />
A2.1.2 Characterization of MSW Leachate<br />
MSW landfill leachate contains organic compounds (typically represented by BOD and COD),<br />
inorganic ions and nutrients, and relatively low concentrations of heavy metals and volatile<br />
organic compounds (VOCs). A large number of reviews of leachate composition from multiple<br />
MD10186.doc 109 29 March 2009