19.01.2013 Views

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

AREA A/B ENGINEERING REPORT - Waste Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Geosyntec Consultants<br />

• Leachate treatment options (i.e., recirculation into waste, pre-treatment systems, direct<br />

POTW discharge, use in existing natural wetlands, creation of new natural or man-made<br />

wetlands, or tree-farming).<br />

Climate conditions have a direct effect on leachate generation rates and<br />

quantities, and indirectly affect available treatment options or operational<br />

performance of the leachate treatment systems (e.g., some treatment<br />

systems are efficient for treating small quantities of leachate but are not<br />

economical for large volumes, while many treatment systems are reliant on<br />

biological processes which may not perform well in cold climates). Sitespecific<br />

conditions and location of a landfill affect layout restrictions (e.g., if little space is<br />

available for leachate management/treatment features, then systems requiring large areas are<br />

obviously not suitable) and effluent (treated leachate) discharge options and permit limitations<br />

(e.g., small, low-flow surface water systems with highly sensitive or pristine ecosystems will impose<br />

stringent limits on effluent quality). Effective leachate management requires assessment of the<br />

operational and post closure lifetime of a landfill, taking account of expected changes in leachate<br />

quantity and quality over time.<br />

While leachate management strategies are critically important during the operational life of a<br />

landfill, sustainable leachate management strategies at the managed modern landfill consider<br />

long-term solutions that have added benefits like the production of “green energy” (i.e., gas to<br />

energy plant) or development of wetlands or tree farms that provide community benefits and<br />

provide for ongoing protection of human health and the environment long after the landfill closes.<br />

Available leachate management alternatives can be broadly categorized as follows:<br />

• Store untreated leachate in onsite tanks, then:<br />

o Truck offsite for disposal at a POTW for treatment with municipal wastewater; or<br />

o Direct discharge to a sewer connection to a POTW;<br />

• Recirculate untreated leachate back into the landfill;<br />

• Use untreated leachate for application in natural or constructed wetlands, tree farming,<br />

etc.; or<br />

• Provide onsite leachate treatment prior to disposal or discharge consistent with the above<br />

options.<br />

The first alternative has historically been the most widespread approach adopted at Subtitle D<br />

landfills, although other options are becoming increasingly common. It should be noted that,<br />

although the primary objective of recirculation is generally provision of cost-effective onsite<br />

management and treatment of leachate, a secondary objective is often accelerated<br />

biodegradation of the waste mass and LFG generation (as discussed in Section 7). Leachate can<br />

be delivered back into the waste mass through a variety of methods, primarily spraying at the<br />

active face, surface infiltration ponds, vertical injection wells, horizontal gravity drainage<br />

MD10186.doc 42 29 March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!